Re: Such as, "non-interventionism"?! Archived Message
Posted by turtleman on July 10, 2019, 1:13 pm, in reply to "Such as, "non-interventionism"?!"
There's no 'revealing insight' based on presumption and ignorance. It's C-o-m-p-a-c-t, not 'contract.' And it is a snake dressed in paper thin benevolence dressing. Do some research. I'll get you started. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Compact_for_Migration Russia's criticism is important: We reiterate our repudiation of the "shared responsibility" concept that, in its current form, merely implies sharing the burden of hosting forced migrants between the States that frequently have nothing to do with the causes of mass exodus of people. We are not in favor of shifting the burden to others, while the current complicated migration situation is largely a result of irresponsible interference into the internal affairs of sovereign States of Middle East and North Africa. In this context, the countries that were actively involved in such interference should primarily bear the greatest responsibility, including for the migration-related consequences. Excellent as far as it goes, but in Russia's self-interest she overlooks something worrying about the underlined, namely that NWO Globalists are coaxing certain Western nations to accept ridiculous numbers as citizens, particularly juicy lands the Globalists are coveting for full control and exploitation, such as Canada. The refugee crisis is, quite potentially and likely, a cynical weapon being used by the Globalists. Of COURSE we should help refugees, but the devilish details and definitions outlined in this 'compact' have a horrid smell. Another interesting detail: The German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel criticised the German Federal Foreign Office in November 2018 for not explaining why the final version of the compact was different from the last published draft by pointing out that the wording had been changed from migration "could have positive effects" to migration "does have positive effects". The Federal Foreign Office did not give a public explanation at that time.[91] By using the German freedom of information act, the newspaper obtained several documents by May 2019 which revealed that the German diplomats had been put under pressure by nations that insisted on extreme demands, like making the pact binding. The details of those talks had been removed from the documents by the Foreign Office, in a self proclaimed attempt to prevent damage to Germanys reputation as a reliable partner. Additionally the paper revealed that the Foreign Office had made false or misleading statements to the press and the opposition, by claiming that the negotiations for the pact in New York had been open to the "interested public", which was not the case, since according to the obtained documents, parts of the Compact had been negotiated in closed sessions.[92] turtleman
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Katie Hopkins gets warm reception as she calls Islam ‘single biggest threat’ to Europe - johnlilburne July 4, 2019, 10:40 pm
- Re: Katie Hopkins gets warm reception as she calls Islam ‘single biggest threat’ to Europe - turtleman July 5, 2019, 3:38 am
- Hello Katie, didn't realise you posted on this board - nm - psingh July 5, 2019, 6:55 am
- Re: Katie Hopkins gets warm reception as she calls Islam ‘single biggest threat’ to Europe - johnlilburne July 5, 2019, 3:28 pm
- Re: Katie Hopkins gets warm reception as she calls Islam ‘single biggest threat’ to Europe - Rich July 5, 2019, 4:39 pm
- Re: Katie Hopkins gets warm reception as she calls Islam ‘single biggest threat’ to Europe - brooks July 5, 2019, 6:37 pm
- Priorities - Gerard July 6, 2019, 10:30 pm
- Re: Katie Hopkins gets warm reception as she calls Islam ‘single biggest threat’ to Europe - Gerard July 6, 2019, 10:37 pm
|
|