Re: The Barefaced Silences of Katherine Viner Archived Message Posted by brooks on July 28, 2019, 3:20 pm, in reply to "The Barefaced Silences of Katherine Viner" Great piece George. You must have been a fly on the wall in that canteen to have described the exchange between Fraudian luminaries on Steve Bell as you did. That's exactly as it must have been! :o) Just in case you have yet to publish it elsewhere, I did notice a couple of typos: Until there is there is a published scientific consensus against Postol the rest of [is] will find Cui Bono a valid question. If the Morning Star is correct [.] Viner refused to print a letter from 200 Jewish women of the wrong sort. The actor Alan Rickman espied dramatic potential in Rachel Corrie’s journal and called on Viner help him edit it into a found play. Its [success] may be why progressives were so hopeful when Viner succeeded Rusbridger as editor in chief in April 2015. (I was thinking that instead of "its success", "its subject matter" might be more apropos.) That episode must have taught Bell that the hunt for witches [as] a hunt for tropes. Message Thread: The Barefaced Silences of Katherine Viner - George Brennan July 27, 2019, 1:08 pm Re: The Barefaced Silences of Katherine Viner - Raskolnikov July 27, 2019, 1:18 pm Re: The Barefaced Silences of Katherine Viner - dovetailjoint July 27, 2019, 4:36 pm A great read [nm] - margo July 27, 2019, 5:11 pm Well said, George! NOM - Rhisiart Gwilym July 27, 2019, 7:42 pm Just got round to reading your piece George, bloody great stuff! Thank you (nm) - Ed July 27, 2019, 11:07 pm Re: The Barefaced Silences of Katherine Viner - brooks July 28, 2019, 3:20 pm Thanks Brooks - George Brennan July 28, 2019, 5:01 pm   Searching