Admittedly ... Archived Message
Posted by Tomski on September 5, 2019, 9:26 pm, in reply to "There's lots of evidence of nano-thermite, T - including the unexploded 'red-grey chips' found in"
... I strayed over into another set of evidence in the last para, that I may not be qualified to judge, except as a layman. Although it does seem logical that if the fire did not cause this, something else did. One doesn't get the flowing molten steel nor free-fall as inconsequential happenstances, i.e. the two documented pieces of evidence, without tripping over the inconsistencies in the official pseudo theory. The interesting part will be how this will be received by the public when it gets reported ... titter . It won't. It will be like it never happened, even whilst it was happening, to loosely quote Harold Pinter. Let's see the peer who is brave enough to review this and agree with the findings. Quite honestly I cannot see any other outcome since it is extremely doubtful that the Alaska Uni team have dropped a series of silly clangers, looking briefly at the report. NIST obviously buckled under pressure, shaming the profession. They were supposed to be the gold standard ... not any more.
|
|