- Re: Would he rot in hell though Mary? Archived Message
Posted by Gerard
on October 19, 2019, 12:57 am, in reply to "Re: Would he rot in hell though Mary?..too toxic to rot I think nm"
|
"Doubts about the integrity of the political process have been growing ever since Labour Party leader John Smith, known as “The Prime Minister who never was”, died suddenly on May 12th 1994. Like many politicians, Smith was a leading lawyer who went on to become Secretary of State for Trade under Callaghan before becoming the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer. Both positions would have been ideal stepping-stones had he ended up taking up residence in Number 10, Downing Street. In both positions John Smith made an impression and was twice named as Parliamentary speaker of the year. Although he was sharp, sarcastic and cutting he always made his point and in the process made many enemies too. In 1988 he was given an Electrocardiography (ECG) in Edinburgh Royal Infirmary where the cardiac specialist told him: “whatever it is, it is not your heart”. In other words John Smith was in good health and tipped to lead the Labour Party to victory in the next election. However like Robin Cook who suffered an unexpected heart attack while walking in the Scottish highlands, Smith died equally unexpectedly after he too suffered a massive heart on May 12, 1994. The 55-year-old leader of the opposition suffered his first attack at his central London flat. He suffered a second heart attack in the ambulance on its way to hospital and was pronounced dead at 0915 BST. While Smith’s death took his political friends and foes by surprise, it conveniently opened the door for Tony Blair to take over as the Labour Party chief. History however, has a nasty habit of repeating itself. A similar chain of events had occurred nearly 30-years earlier when the then Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell died after visiting the Soviet embassy in January 1963. Like John Smith and Robin Cook, Gaitskell was a fit man in his fifties with no prior record of heart problems. Nonetheless, a sudden and unexpected heart attack killed Gaitskell and conveniently opened the way for Harold Wilson; which pleased the Soviets as his policies played right into their hands, and led to suspicions of foul play as like John Smith, Gaitskell was poised to become prime minister. The Porton Down disease specialist, Dr. Ladell later secretly reviewed Gaitskell’s death and concluded that he was indeed probably murdered. The similarities between the deaths of both these potential prime ministers and those who conveniently replaced them raise many questions. For both deaths opened the doors of power to those who seemed ready to serve interests other the national interest." http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=48459 "John Smith QC MP was a Scottish politician who served as leader of the Labour Party from 1992 until his sudden and unexpected death from a heart attack in 1994. As with all unexpected deaths of prominent politicians such as that of Robin Cook, there was some speculation at the time that his death was suspicious but there was no apparent specific motive. However, events since the coming to power of New Labour in 1997 present a much clearer reason why John Smith might have been murdered. John Smith's death was certainly convenient for some people. Suspiciously convenient. Cui bono?* Lucius Cassius Longinus Ravilla, whom the Romans regarded as a very honest and wise judge, was in the habit of asking, time and again, "To whose benefit?" John Smith was a traditional Old Labourite. If he had lived and gone on to win the 1997 General Election, there would not have been New Labour in its present form. One of the main differences between Old Labour and New Labour is that New Labour is Fabian. John Smith was not a Fabian. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are Fabians. The ultimate objective of the Fabians is to create a One World Communitarian ('Third Way') government. This ties in with the New World Order project. John Smith was not a One World Communitarian and would have been distrusted by the NWO/Bilderberg brigade who wanted someone at the head of the UK government whom they could manipulate. Strange things have been happening in Britain in recent years. For example, the police have lost their common sense. This is because Fabian New Labour has a hidden agenda. The management mechanism being used to carry out the true and hidden agenda of Fabian New Labour is a fraudulent 'educational charity' called Common Purpose. You can find out more about Common Purpose here: www.stopcp.com and here: www.cpexposed.com Remember, the NWO/Bilderberg group are playing for extremely high stakes and have no qualms about getting rid of people who stand in their way. Fabian New Labour are, after all, quite willing to join wars started on the basis of lies. There are literally no depths to which this institutionally-corrupt Fabian New Labour government will not descend: multi-billion Eurofraud, relentless and ruthless abuses of citizens, lying, cheating, secrecy, going to war on the basis of lies, oppressive social control, abrogating sovereign rule to Brussels, corruption, deceit, fraud, treachery, bankrupting the country and so on. So the motive for murder - get rid of John Smith in favour of a Fabian (Tony Blair) who would have been happy to go along with the Fabian/Bilderberg/NWO One World Communitarian Government project. "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear." Marcus Tullius Cicero - (106-43 BC) Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator" http://didnwofabiansmurderjohnsmithmp.blogspot.com/ "Tony Blair predicted to his wife that John Smith would die prematurely and he would win the race to become the next Labour leader, not Gordon Brown. He made the “strange” statement during a stay in a French hotel with his family in April 2004, the month before Mr Smith suffered a fatal heart attack, Mr Blair woke his wife, Cherie, one morning and told her: “If John dies, I will be leader, not Gordon. And somehow, I think this will happen. I just think it will.""https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/7976017/Tony-Blair-predicted-John-Smiths-early-death.html "Blair's predecessor as Labour leader, John Smith, also died of a surprise heart attack. Many suspected it was induced, as did one photographer I spoke to who was at the hospital when Smith was pronounced dead. Most polite Brits however will keep schtum for fear of upsetting the family." https://www.rt.com/op-ed/167308-nato-democracy-war/ *Indeed....the same question needs to be asked (esp. in this regard), with regard to the deaths of the servicemen in the Mull of Kintyre helicopter "accident".. Tony did seem to have found such a good "new friend" in G.W.Bush..few could explain it... Any other articles greatly appreciated (what was the name of the drama-doc concerning this?), .. |