Re: Ultimately a racist dialectic. Archived Message
Posted by Thomas Newfield on December 11, 2019, 6:33 am, in reply to "Re: Ultimately a racist dialectic."
it merely points out[/i] that Corbyn is not a threat to British Jews generally "Points out". But, what if they're wrong? Can a Jew be wrong about such a thing? And is Corbyn a threat to the Welsh? Where are the Welsh standing up and saying Corbyn is not a threat to them? That there is no evidence that Corbyn is a threat to the poor Welsh is not relevant - by this logic. Some Welsh may well think he is a threat... should not their voice be heard too? It's all fine if you're concerned with the media, optics and all that. And if you believe Identity is the final (or, biggest) criterion for the truth of one thing or another - that's a popular ideology these days of course. If you just want to know what's true or not though, pushing one group's views makes you a hostage to that group. Whether most or not most Jews "think" Corbyn is anti-semitic is not so relevant. Making it seem relevant is therefore an assault on truth.
|
|