The Lifeboat News
[ Message Archive | The Lifeboat News ]

    Logical flaw there, Sue: NK questionable about another matter entirely, so his message on this one Archived Message

    Posted by RhG on December 22, 2019, 10:02 am, in reply to "Dr Nick Kollerstrom had his UCL fellowship withdrawn for holocaust denial"

    must be automatically suspect? Really? It's what the defenders of the official cospithirry will bleat, of course - if they bother to respond at all. But still, the messenger/message distinction applies.

    We can think of regular contributors here, can't we, who are obviously right up the creek on certain issues, yet are nevertheless useful, reliable witnesses on other, less personal-hot-button matters? It happens. Messenger is not equal to message.

    Whatever NK's ideas about the nazi mass killings, it's been obvious from the outset that the official cospithirry about 7/7 is too full of holes to take seriously. And by now it's difficult for any awake-and-paying-attention person not to suspect that we in the West are indeed being subjected to a long series of contrived 'terrorist' incidents, to keep us all in line.

    And btw, do we really accept that, in the whole wide field of historiography, only THE sacred, holy, capital-H Holocaust - the one and only! (hah! Consider the writings of Dr. Gideon Polya: https://sites.google.com/site/drgideonpolya/home) - must never be subjected to any rational reappraisal by later generations of historians, after the dust of WW2 has long settled...? The fact of the matter is that neither I nor most others really, actually know what happened in the camps at the time of the nazis. We only know with any certainty the official story with which we've been gavaged constantly - especially since it became a zionism-justifying weapon for zionistan-in-Palestine. Winner-written 'history', in other words. And how impartially-accurate is that? Ever?

    As one who strives in principle at all times to be an open-minded sceptic - the real thing, that is - I'm open to the idea that the current official legend may have some holes in it, that would repay diligent, honest, agenda-free research. That can't be taboo. Nor can it be justification for trashing everything such a sceptic may say, on any topic.

    Consider too a further crucially important idea: If 7/7, 11/9, the Gladio killings, and all the rest really were false-flags, that means - inescapably - that there are not just individuals by entire organisations within the Western ruling establishments which are cold-bloodedly willing to prepare, with skilled professional expertise, and then to execute mass-murder attacks on entire groups of innocent fellow-humans - indeed, fellow compatriots - simply for purposes of hard-faced realpolitik. That idea hardly needs defending, does it, when you look at all the multiple holocausts that we - humankind - have created and are creating still, right now? Remember those unidentified 'mlitary officers' who openly threatened coup-d'etat action against a legitimate British government if Jeremy Corbyn made it into Downing Street. Do we imagine that that same hard-faced determination wouldn't drive also the act of faking false-flag mass killings, even against 'ones own' people; especially the mere expendable civilian plebs, whom many of 'our own' military regard with barely-concealed - and lethal - contempt? Plenty of hom-saps are entirely at ease with such villainy. The armed forces of the world are replete with them.

    Btw2: I agree that your point about the post-mortems needs looking into further. That could be a genuine data point that contradicts one of NK's assertions. Or it could be simply a well-placed 'corroborative' story put out by the real deep-state organisers. They - er - they are known to do such things, aren't they? 'Gekaufte Journalisten' and all that. That needs considering. But either way, it doesn't negate NK's whole thesis, even so, does it?

    Message Thread: