Nice one Ken : ) ... Archived Message Posted by Tomski on May 7, 2020, 8:33 pm, in reply to "-It's apparently a concrete construction." WTC7 is a 'special' steel framed building. It didn't burn on the outside. No Genfell that. I think people see a burning building and have their radar dialled on '911 collapse' naturally Why was the WTC7 collapse 'special'? ... Hint: it may have required a touch of nano-thermite. Think I am nuts? - read all about it in the proper peer-reviewed paper: https://bit.ly/Hulsey-WTC-report-Org Case closed ... and by corollary WTC 1 and 2 collapse scenario is a given look-alike, surely? Whatever. Meanwhile, it would have been much more difficult to prove WTC1&2 collapse case, what with kerosene ‘fire’ and impact? Dr Hulsey’s team went for the low-hanging fruit (no impact and only ‘office’ fires) requiring only a year or so of number-crunching, for 2 hard-working smart Chinese guys with nifty software and a good team lead. Message Thread: Residential tower in flames UAE. - Ken Waldron May 5, 2020, 9:43 pm Re: Residential tower in flames UAE. - Rich May 6, 2020, 10:07 am My thought too. We all know fires in steel-frames cause straight-down free-fall collapse. That's - Rhisiart Gwilym May 6, 2020, 12:27 pm Re: My thought too. We all know fires in steel-frames cause straight-down free-fall collapse. That's - Rich May 6, 2020, 1:04 pm -It's apparently a concrete construction. - Ken Waldron May 6, 2020, 1:32 pm Re: -It's apparently a concrete construction. - Rich May 6, 2020, 7:13 pm "mullti-disciplinary engineering cum demolition experts" rush in where wise men fear to thread. nm - Der May 7, 2020, 8:19 am Nice one Ken : ) ... - Tomski May 7, 2020, 8:33 pm   Searching