The Lifeboat News
[
Message Archive
|
The Lifeboat News
]
Flying blind
📂 Archived Message
Posted by Tomski
on May 20, 2020, 11:58 pm, in reply to "
EE (BT) crowing about their coverage
"
https://www.nationofchange.org/2020/04/18/flying-blind-scientists-warn-harmful-biologic-health-effects-from-5g-wireless-radiation/
Message Thread:
|
This response
↓
Even Scientific American admits that 5G could devastate public health
-
rippon
May 20, 2020, 9:09 am
Good article. Thanks. And, even better, nothing about Sars-2!
-
Der
May 20, 2020, 10:12 am
I am just watching the 5G debate on utube
-
Adamski
May 20, 2020, 10:20 am
EE (BT) crowing about their coverage
-
Mary
May 20, 2020, 11:42 am
'There is obviously no escape'...
-
Si
May 20, 2020, 1:14 pm
Flying blind
-
Tomski
May 20, 2020, 11:58 pm
For clarity, the SA article was an opinion piece by Moskowitz himself
-
Matt
May 21, 2020, 7:30 am
Re: For clarity, the SA article was an opinion piece by Moskowitz himself
-
walter
May 21, 2020, 11:21 pm
The rest of the introduction
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 12:04 am
More on the WHO - "show us the money, Mike"
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 12:16 am
To the detail we go
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 2:42 am
Thanks for the comments / analysis all nt
-
Matt
May 22, 2020, 11:52 am
Thanks for posting Matt
-
waltr
May 23, 2020, 4:41 pm
More on that Interphone study
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 12:38 pm
And that Danish study
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 1:44 pm
The next thing he links to, radar safety, is nonexistent
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 2:09 pm
"no known plausible biophysical mechanism"? Er, melatonin reduction, DNA damage, oxidative stress?
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 5:42 pm
Re: "no known plausible biophysical mechanism"? Er, melatonin reduction, DNA damage, oxidative stress?
-
Adamski
May 22, 2020, 11:29 pm
Re: "no known plausible biophysical mechanism"? Er, melatonin reduction, DNA damage, oxidative stress?
-
walter
May 23, 2020, 12:39 am
Re: "no known plausible biophysical mechanism"? Er, melatonin reduction, DNA damage, oxidative stress?
-
Gerard
May 24, 2020, 6:29 pm
In summary: this response to Moskowits is nothing but bluster and misllading spin; no substance (nm)
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 5:44 pm
Thanks Matt. Rippon - no comment to
-
Adamski
May 21, 2020, 9:38 pm
here's a comment
-
rippon
May 21, 2020, 10:28 pm
Re: here's a comment
-
waltr
May 21, 2020, 11:13 pm
Re: here's a comment
-
Ken Waldron
May 22, 2020, 3:43 am
Any whistleblowers from WHO?
-
Adamski
May 22, 2020, 4:19 am
Re: here's a comment
-
Adamski
May 22, 2020, 9:24 am
Rippon - what do you say to my mate who reckons
-
Adamski
May 22, 2020, 9:21 am
Re: Rippon - what do you say to my mate who reckons
-
rippon
May 22, 2020, 9:39 am
Re: Rippon - what do you say to my mate who reckons
-
Adamski
May 22, 2020, 10:05 am
The Precautionary Principle
-
walter
May 22, 2020, 11:03 am
«
Index
Searching