The difference: I consider myself expert in lizards not being people; assuming the usual definitions. And you are expert as well. We have all the evidence we need. I file it in my brain under 'impossible', that saves time I find
Like I said, no difference: I consider myself an expert on viruses not being caused by cell phone towers, assuming the usual definitions. I have all the evidence I need. I file it in my brain under 'twaddle' and find that saves time as well.
Did I say "silenced"
Yes, you said the "people alleging evidence have been silenced", see above link.
You do understand the distinction between a message board administrator - in this case one who's an even greater expert in knowing that viruses are not caused by cell phone technology - removing idiotic "theories" in order to preserve some semblance of credibility for his board, and "silencing" those theories? At least I hope you do.
though it wasn't wholly ridiculous
No, it really was.
but seemed to be proved wrong by events
If there was ever anything in the "theory" that rose above the level of idiocy that needed to be "proved wrong by events" please reference it as I'm genuinely curious.