The Lifeboat News
[ Message Archive | The Lifeboat News ]

    Thanks David. I try to avoid pre-disposition when presenting evidence but its getting more difficult Archived Message

    Posted by walter on June 5, 2020, 11:53 am, in reply to "More distraction than explanation Walter - the Lancet study was a SHAM.."

    I try not to project based just on my own instincts. Your wider background is compelling though. I saw this at the time but the HCQ picture wasn't so clear to me. It's like the whole tapestry is never visible at once, just in little pieces.

    The context in which this fraud, if that's what it is (see I can't stop myself ) will be hard to change. By which I mean the support culture for pharma-set narratives within the med establishemnt.

    It's a bit heartening that the gross issues of the lack of probity of the Lancet study, together with the importance of the issues, were clearly too much for the normally rather compliant medical professionals in the sub-hierarchy to bear, and led to a mini-rebellion. Good on them for that.

    However without these probity issues they were already bearing rather a lot; particularly the sidelining of the key parameters of Lancet, the avoidance of (crucial) early HCQ treatment and the absence of azithromycin (this wasn't the case in the Lancet study, but other studies in this category were being held up to dismiss HCQ with little demurring).
    Also, the number of commentators (almost the whole establishment including the media and sciency/medical bloggers everywhere) willing to spin the actual results of a moderately positive prophylactic HCQ study as a nail in HCQ's coffin, while ignoring another extremely positive prophylactic study the week before, is a major part of the backdrop in which the Lancet deceptions were able to thrive for a while. Lancet is no more, but what will be done about that fertile backdrop for the next one, that will not be so outrageously based?
    https://members5.boardhost.com/xxxxx/msg/1591141134.html

    Message Thread: