- It all goes back to Raoults first trial in late February.. Archived Message
Posted by David Macilwain
on June 17, 2020, 8:46 am, in reply to "Re: Highly significant development, and AAPS link very useful for evidence as well "
|
- which is in fact the small trial quoted by Harvey Risch. I have read the details of that trial repeatedly since Escobar drew attention to it, and its results are exactly as portrayed by Risch - the small study size made irrelevant by the significance of the results. It's also important to appreciate that the patients were not simply assessed as "recovered" or not, but were tested daily with swabs and the viral load found. The dismissal of this trial we can now see as the start of the determined attempt to destroy the life saving drug's credibility across Western media influenced society. I am also struck by the fact that had Raoult's results been followed up at the time - three months ago - then many thousands or tens of thousands of lives would have been saved, including others who were lost as a result of the pressure on hospitals. Compared with Boris' pathetic quote that "had this great new drug been used initially, many thousands of lives would have been saved" - even though the majority given the steroid actually died, the failure to use HCQ and AZM initially was criminal and careless manslaughter - because they knew it at the time. |