One or two fundamental assumptions there, S, that might not stand up too well to a circle of Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym on August 9, 2020, 10:34 pm, in reply to "(There is a short editing repetition at the very end of the vid) nm"
muscular philosophers kicking them about. Never a good idea to slide quietly over the unproven, and possibly mistaken, nature of your axiomatic assumptions. Agree largely with what he says though. But no scientist - worthy of the name - should ever dally with the idea that we know anything at all with cast-iron, unquestionable certainty. That would be a dogma of the - deeply unscientific - religion of scientism. The essence of the classic scientific method is never to assume that anything at all is ever established beyond possibility of question. 'Wait,andkeepseeing', as one might call it...
|
|