Now you are effectively saying that rejecting an official narrative is a right-wing position.
And, again, your inability to think beyond a simpleton's soundbytes is demonstrated:
My argument (if you were able to pay attention) is that people, e.g. me, would accept constraints on their freedoms if they saw the government policing the primary culprits (the corporations) and not just the little people; and also if many scientists were not punching massive holes in that narrative.
You are behaving like a dupe in accepting the narrative that responsibility lies with ordinary people and not the powerful - an instance of useful-idiot for the state-corporate sector (government and big-pharma).