You treat the Independent as a respected source?Archived Message
Posted by rippon on August 28, 2020, 7:32 pm, in reply to "Certainly is..."
Again, playing the man instead of the ball.
The intelligent mature ethical response would be to explain/indicate why the numbers that girl cites are bollocks.
You are indulging in the same miserable level of argument as this:
* Corbyn can't be taken seriously on Israel-Palestine because he called Hamas friends.
* Assange can't be taken seriously on leaks because his output helped Trump and sank Clinton.
Guilt by association is a miserable little game to play. You should really counter someone on the basis of what they say, not on the basis of whatever links can be found/made between them and (allegedly) immoral others.