The Lifeboat News
[ Message Archive | The Lifeboat News ]

    Phone Hacking & Julian Assange Archived Message

    Posted by sashimi on October 16, 2020, 9:00 am

    (quote)
    Catherine Brown explores how the wrong journalists escaped prosecution
    in one case while the wrong one is being subjected to it in the other.


    The U.K. phone hacking scandal started around 2005 and peaked in
    2012. The journalistic malpractices and illegal practices on which it
    focused long pre-date 2005, however, and continue today.

    It came to light through the testimony of victims and the
    investigative journalism of publications such as The Guardian that
    several newspapers owned by Rupert Murdoch's News International
    (U.K. subsidiary of News Corp), as well as others including Daily
    Mirror and Sunday Mirror, were engaged in illegal practices such as
    hacking individuals' phone voicemails and bribing the police in order
    to obtain stories.

    Rupert Murdoch's influence over U.K. politicians was also
    scrutinized. Victims of phone hacking included members of the royal
    family, politicians, murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, relatives of
    British soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan and victims of the
    July 7, 2005, London bombings.

    The public outcry at these revelations and resultant investigations
    resulted in high-profile resignations including Murdoch as director of
    News Corporation, his son James as its executive chairman and the
    commissioner of London's Metropolitan Police Force. There were
    multiple charges and seven convictions in criminal trials held between
    2004 and 2014. News of the World, a News International outlet, closed
    down after 168 years of existence.

    In 2011, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron established a
    public inquiry into the culture and ethics of the U.K. press under
    Lord Justice Leveson.

    This inquiry resulted in the 2012 Leveson Report, which made several
    recommendations concerning regulation of the British media by an
    independent regulator, which would give alleged press victims access
    to arbitration without financial risk.

    Conservative governments since 2012 have declined to implement
    Leveson's recommendations. In 2011, the FBI and the Department of
    Justice launched probes into News Corporation practices in the U.S.,
    but no decisive action has been taken.

    When the Medium is the Message
    If you believe the word itself, the media mediates. It isn't anything
    in itself. It transmits something else.

    In general journalists do not want to be the story. They want to
    inform, disinform, persuade, distract, entertain, but not be the focus
    of attention themselves. This applies to WikiLeaks publisher Julian
    Assange as much as it applies to the journalists who hacked the phone
    of murdered schoolgirl Millie Dowler.

    But sometimes the medium does become the message, and the journalist
    becomes the story written by other journalists, as in both those
    cases.

    We have seen the former CEO of News International Rebekah Brookes, and
    Assange, arrested, put on trial, and subject to huge amounts of
    journalistic attention, because their journalism, it was alleged,
    broke the law.

    In both cases the question of their methods overshadowed their matter
    - their matter being for example that Dowler's parents left messages
    on Millie's phone in March 2002 that were hacked, or that
    U.S. soldiers killed over a dozen Baghdadi civilians in July 2007.

    These things were revealed around the same time and involved some of
    the same people. For example, journalist Nick Davies was leading the
    investigations of phone hacking at The Guardian whilst he was working
    with Assange to publish the Afghan war logs.

    But there are differences. And in them I think we see clearly one of
    the ways in which our society has gone wrong.

    Though I am going to be concentrating on newspapers, which have
    increasingly struggled over the past decade in print form, they retain
    considerable influence in electronic form, setting the agenda for TV
    news and therefore for politics. Their domination by a few magnates
    who have influence over politicians parallels the situation in social
    media, where voices that hold power to account are increasingly
    squeezed out, albeit in less obvious ways.

    So, let's compare them. I'm going to compare them on seven points, and
    then I'm done.
    (/quote)
    -- Cont'd at https://consortiumnews.com/2020/10/15/phone-hacking-julian-assange/

    Message Thread:

    • Phone Hacking & Julian Assange - sashimi October 16, 2020, 9:00 am