- Starmer and Helen Steel Archived Message
- Starmer and Helen Steel - johnlilburne October 18, 2020, 2:31 am
- Anything to say, Jess Philips? - Keith-264 October 18, 2020, 9:42 am
Posted by johnlilburne
on October 18, 2020, 2:31 am
|
Prosecutors have decided not to charge four undercover officers for forming sexual relationships with women during their covert missions – but the Metropolitan police is considering whether to bring misconduct proceedings against the officers. ........ The women said they were dismayed. Helen Steel, the environmental and social justice campaigner who was deceived by undercover police officer John Dines during a two-year relationship, said the decision showed that the cover-up of abuse by undercover police continued. On Twitter, she added: "This is institutional sexism. Protecting officers not women." It is not known if Dines was one of the men examined by the CPS. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/21/undercover-officers-relationships-women-not-charged Starmer defended Steel in the McLibel case - and bigged up his role in the leadership contest. Starmer and most of the Labour Party abstained on CHIS. CHIS will give the green light to undercover cops to effectively carry on raping with impunity. Anything to say, Jess Philips? |
| Message Thread:
|