Two things here... Archived Message
Posted by David Macilwain on November 23, 2020, 11:02 am, in reply to "Labour calls for emergency censorship laws for anti-vax content"
I'm not anti-vax either, having a GP father who had childhood polio. But this virus is not polio or smallpox or yellow fever, and it's doubtful whether vaccination would be either justified or necessary for the bulk of the population, particularly in poorer countries. There is far more potential danger to them from vaccination, particularly with one of these untried and highly unusual mRNA vaccines. The previous article I wrote for AHT - "Vaccines - who needs them?" sounds like an anti vaxer rant, but like much of my input is based on the wise words of Didier Raoult, who suggested that a vaccine needed to be tested on 50 or 100,000 people before it could be pronounced safer than catching the infection for anyone under 50. The Russian and Chinese vaccines to my mind are worth considering, if you don't manage to get exposed to the Virus. Anyway who could possibly trust these manipulators?
|
Message Thread:
- Labour calls for emergency censorship laws for anti-vax content - margo November 21, 2020, 6:17 pm
- Typicial of Liarbour - Keith-264 November 21, 2020, 6:19 pm
- Re: Labour calls for emergency censorship laws for anti-vax content - Gerard November 21, 2020, 6:25 pm
- Re: Labour calls for emergency censorship laws for anti-vax content - margo November 21, 2020, 6:27 pm
- Big pharma did this to themselves. Its *nobody else's* fault .. - Shyaku November 21, 2020, 7:21 pm
- Re: Labour calls for emergency censorship laws for anti-vax content - Mary November 21, 2020, 8:27 pm
- Two things here... - David Macilwain November 23, 2020, 11:02 am
|
|