- Re: Whenever something unfunny happens at a color revolution protest there are also idiiots just having Archived Message
Posted by brooks
on January 29, 2021, 12:41 am, in reply to "Whenever something unfunny happens at a color revolution protest there are also idiiots just having"
|
Not sure what you're getting at, but your post seems to rest on a bunch of questionable assumptions, eg: The question really revolves around the ones with military training and whether they were organized, and if so, self-organized only? I'm not sure the real question does revolve around that. I'd say it really revolves around the decision that the Capitol building would not be protected: who made it and why? And what will be the consequences - if any - for them? Will there be an inquiry and if not, why not? The military training of the rioters and their level of organization is of secondary importance since, if security had been seriously enforced instead of deliberately not enforced, there never would have been rioters inside the Capitol building - organized or not - to begin with and we would not even be having this conversation. I really can't see why colour revolutions have anything to do with this. There was no revolution, no one was overthrown, and no one installed, nor did it come anywhere close to this, nor is there is any substantial difference, from the perspective of corporate America, in the corruption level and malleability of the incoming and outgoing presidents. If anything, the incoming one would be preferable. You say the idiots having fun should be forgotten while at the same time claiming they constitute "cover". Cover for what? If for a planned operation, they constitute evidence of that operation and should be remembered. I don't think you can have it both ways. re "But a coup is probably the wrong word, since the propaganda arm was no on-side." The definition of coup does not require there be a propaganda arm - whatever you may be referring to by that - that is on-side. A coup is simply the removal of a government from power, either with the support or the hostility of the media, either with or without people ready to staff the civilian offices of government. Coup is the wrong word, but for reasons unrelated to and much more obvious, compelling and fundamental than these, so it seems to me. re If I know these guys, they were doing what they always do, intimidation. What guys? The rioters? The cops letting the rioters in? Which rioters? The head of security? Trump and his entourage? Trump-supporting Republicans? The Pentagon? Q-Shaman? All of the above? re Many of these guys would have been intimate with past color revolutions Again, I really can't see what color revolutions have to do with any of this, what guys you mean or what intimacy you're referring to. Frankly it's all a bit murky. |