Trench warfare was far safer than open warfare 📂 Archived Message
Posted by Keith-264 on May 26, 2021, 6:22 pm, in reply to "Re: The ‘Missile Intifada’ Brings an Era Crashing Down - Crooke"
The British and French arrived at the theory of the creeping barrage in late 1914, a combination of the French rafale and the British direct-fire artillery tactics. For most of the war, an infantry battalion spent twelve days in the line, four in the front line, four in support and four in reserve. At the Battle of Verdun, the French withdrew a division when its casualties reached 50%. The Germans kept the same divisions in the line and topped them up with replacements, a policy reversed on the Somme and in 1917. The problem with trench warfare is that it is paradoxical. It limits casualties but un-limits the length of the war, which causes more casualties.
|
| Message Thread:
- The ‘Missile Intifada’ Brings an Era Crashing Down - Crooke - Tomski May 26, 2021, 3:53 pm
- Palestine: Hamas defeats Israel - military perspective - The Saker - Tomski May 26, 2021, 3:59 pm
- Re: The ‘Missile Intifada’ Brings an Era Crashing Down - Crooke - Ken May 26, 2021, 4:06 pm
- Trench warfare was far safer than open warfare - Keith-264 May 26, 2021, 6:22 pm
- Tunnels also the defensive weapon of N. Korea, if not mistaken. Thanks, nm - Shyaku May 26, 2021, 8:05 pm
« Index |
|