- Re: Debate about Duma Chemical attack
- Debate about Duma Chemical attack - Adamski July 17, 2021, 2:21 am
Posted by Raskolnikov
on July 17, 2021, 7:12 am, in reply to "Debate about Duma Chemical attack"
|
I referenced this in a post down-board. I watched it and thought Vaush came off incredibly badly but it was desperately in need of a moderator. For the sake of fairness I'm posting the debate from Jackson's stream too as they were both muting each other at various points. Vaush apparently did a "prep stream" the night before and partially exposed his DMs showing he had been getting coached by TYT's Francesca Fiorentini and their "Syrian expert" Patrick Hilsman (based in Brooklyn). Vaush doesn't know anything about this subject but my god he comes off as an arrogant twat in the "debate". [url= I think it's clear that Jackson came off better but I think he's let this go to his head a little bit. Jackson now thinks he's going to embark on a series of debates with Destiny and Sam Seder being his next targets but as much as I dislike Seder he is a massive policy wonk and he will be able to run rings around JH standing on his head. He did well here because Vaush was so bad but gl to him. My main point made in the previous post on this was that there seems to be a massive uptick in "channel v channel" drama among left-leaning alternative media just lately, exactly when the Biden admin has started making big moves which seems very convenient. Sure, some of it (TYT getting exposed as the shills they are for example) has been somewhat worthwhile but there seems to be quite a lot of channels where the sole content is reporting twitter fights and "response videos" of one side or another in whatever the latest fight is. It's the classic "Life of Brian" view of the left. Bloody Popuplar Front. Splitters! |
| Message Thread:
« Index |