The Lifeboat News
[ Message Archive | The Lifeboat News ]

    Justin Podure: Canada is waging an all-front legal war against Indigenous people 📂 Archived Message

    Posted by sashimi on August 5, 2021, 7:16 am

    3 August 2021

    Lede: After mass graves full of Indigenous children have been found, how can
    Canada justify ongoing land theft?

    (quote)
    Canada is developing a new image: one of burning churches, toppling statues, and
    mass graves. There are thousands more unmarked graves, thousands more Indigenous
    children killed at residential schools, remaining to be unearthed. There can be
    no denying that this is Canada, and it has to change. But can Canada transform
    itself for the better? If the revelation of the mass killing of Indigenous
    children is to lead to any actual soul-searching and any meaningful change, the
    first order of business is for Canada to stop its all-front war against First
    Nations. Much of that war is taking place through the legal system.

    Canadian politicians have said as much, adopting a motion in June calling for
    the government to stop fighting residential school survivors in court. A
    long-standing demand, it has been repeated by Indigenous advocates who have
    expressed amazement in the face of these horrific revelations that the Canadian
    government would nonetheless continue to fight Indigenous survivors of
    systematic child abuse by the state.

    To get a sense of the scope of Canada's legal war on First Nations, I looked at
    a Canadian legal database containing decisions (case law) pertaining to First
    Nations. I also looked at the hearing lists of the Federal Court of Canada for
    ongoing cases. My initial goal was to identify where Canada could easily settle
    or abandon cases, bringing about a harmonious solution to these conflicts. Two
    things surprised me.

    The first was the volume and diversity of lawsuits Canada is fighting. Canada is
    fighting First Nations everywhere, on an astoundingly wide range of issues.

    The second thing: Canada is losing.

    The Attack on Indigenous Children and Women
    In his 1984 essay "'Pioneering' in the Nuclear Age," political theorist Eqbal
    Ahmad argued that the "four fundamental elements... without which an indigenous
    community cannot survive" were "land, water, leaders and culture." Canada fights
    Indigenous people over land, water, fishing rights, mining projects, freedom of
    movement, and more. The assault on Indigenous nations is also a war against
    Indigenous children and women.

    In the high-profile case of First Nations Child & Family Caring Society of
    Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada, laid out in detail by Cindy
    Blackstock, "the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada and the
    Assembly of First Nations filed a complaint under the Canadian Human Rights Act
    alleging" in 2007 "that the Government of Canada had a longstanding pattern of
    providing less government funding for child welfare services to First Nations
    children on reserves than is provided to non-Aboriginal children." The Canadian
    Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) found in favor of the First Nations complainants in
    2016.

    Note that this isn't about the history of residential schools. It's about
    discrimination against Indigenous kids in the present day. "In fact, the problem
    might be getting worse," writes Blackstock, compared to "the height of
    residential school operations." As evidence, she refers to a 2005 study of three
    sample provinces showing a wide gap between the percent of First Nations
    children in child welfare care (10.23 percent) compared to a much lower rate for
    non-First Nations children (0.67 percent). In 2006, following the Canadian
    government's repeated failures to act on the inequity described in this report
    (which also included comprehensive suggested reforms that had both moral and
    economic appeal), Blackstock writes, "the Caring Society and the Assembly of
    First Nations agreed that legal action was required." The CHRT was very clear in
    its 2019 decision that the federal government should compensate each victim the
    maximum amount, which addressed the victims as follows:

    No amount of compensation can ever recover what you have lost, the scars that
    are left on your souls or the suffering that you have gone through as a result
    of racism, colonial practices and discrimination.

    In May 2021, Canada, which has spent millions of dollars fighting this case,
    tried to overturn the CHRT's ruling.

    Canada's war on Indigenous children is also a war on Indigenous women. The
    sterilization of Indigenous women, beginning with Canada's eugenics program
    around 1900, is another act of genocide, as scholar Karen Stote has
    argued. Indigenous women who had tubal ligation without their consent as part of
    this eugenics program have brought a class-action suit against the provinces of
    Alberta and British Columbia, both of which had Sexual Sterilization Acts in
    their provincial laws from the 1920s in Alberta and 1930s in British Columbia
    until the early 1970s, and Saskatchewan, where sexual sterilization legislation
    was proposed but failed by one vote in 1930. A Senate committee found a case of
    forced sterilization of an Indigenous woman as recently as 2019.

    The Legal-Financial War on First Nations Organisations
    As Bob Joseph outlines in his 2018 book 21 Things You May Not Know About the
    Indian Act, Canada first gave itself the right to decide Indian status in the
    Gradual Civilization Act of 1857, which created a process by which Indigenous
    people could give up their Indian status and so become "enfranchised" - which
    they would have to do if they wanted to attend higher education or become
    professionals. The apartheid system was updated through the Indian Act of 1876,
    from which sprang many evils including both the residential schools and the
    assertion of Canadian control over the way First Nations govern themselves.

    In 1927, when Indigenous veterans of World War I began to hold meetings with one
    another to discuss their situation, Canada passed laws forbidding Indigenous
    people from political organisation and from raising funds to hire legal counsel
    (and from playing billiards, among other things).

    The Indian Act - which is still in effect today with amendments, despite
    multiple attempts to repeal it - outlawed traditional governance structures and
    gave Canada the power to intervene to remove and install Indigenous governance
    authorities at will - which Canada did continuously, from Six Nations in 1924 to
    Barriere Lake in 1995. As a result, at any given moment, many First Nations are
    still embroiled in lawsuits over control of their own governments.

    Canada controls the resources available to First Nations, including drinking
    water. In another national embarrassment, Canada has found itself able to
    provision drinking water to diamond mines but not First Nations. This battle too
    has entered the courts, with a class-action suit by Tataskweyak Cree Nation,
    Curve Lake First Nation, and Neskantaga First Nation demanding that Canada not
    only compensate their nations, but also work with them to build the necessary
    water systems.

    Canada dribbles out humiliating application processes by which Indigenous people
    can try to exercise their human right to housing. When combined with the housing
    crisis on reserves, these application processes have attracted swindlers like
    consultant Jerry Paulin, who sued Cat Lake First Nation for $1.2 million,
    claiming that his efforts were the reason the First Nation received federal
    funds for urgent housing repairs.

    Canada uses the threat of withdrawal of these funds to impose stringent
    financial "transparency" conditions on First Nations - the subject of legal
    struggle, in which Cold Lake First Nations has argued that the financial
    transparency provisions violate their rights. Canada has used financial
    transparency claims to put First Nations finances under third-party management,
    withholding and misusing the funds in a not-very-transparent way, as the
    Algonquins of Barriere Lake charged in another lawsuit. An insistence on
    transparency is astounding for a country that buried massive numbers of
    Indigenous children in unmarked graves.

    Win or lose, the lawsuits themselves impose high costs on First Nations whose
    finances are, for the most part, controlled by Canada. The result is situations
    like the one where the Beaver Lake Cree are suing Canada for costs because they
    ran out of money suing Canada for their land. When First Nations are winning in
    court, Canada tries to bankrupt them before they get there.

    Land and Resources Are the Core of the Struggle
    The core issue between Canada and First Nations is land. Most battles are over
    the land on which the state of Canada sits, all of which was stolen and much of
    which was swindled through legal processes that couldn't hold up to scrutiny and
    are now unraveling. "(I)n simple acreage," the late Indigenous leader Arthur
    Manuel wrote in the 2017 book The Reconciliation Manifesto, this was "the
    biggest land theft in the history of mankind," reducing Indigenous people from
    holding 100 percent of the landmass to 0.2 percent.
    (/quote)
    -- Cont'd at https://www.newsclick.in/canada-waging-all-front-legal-war-indigenous-people

    Message Thread:

    • Justin Podure: Canada is waging an all-front legal war against Indigenous people - sashimi August 5, 2021, 7:16 am

    « Index