- Re: It's a technical issue : ) ... the first bit
Posted by Willem 
on August 9, 2021, 12:30 am, in reply to "It's a technical issue : ) ... the first bit"
|
Willem imo was skating on thin ice and could have been mistaken for 'virus denial' when this was discussed earlier re Alberta legal case vid. What nonsense. I have never denied the existence of this virus in the same way I have never denied the existence of a flu virus or any other virus. Do we have to start posts critical of corona policy with a declaration in belief of a virus, much like criticism of UK policy towards Syria must be preceded by condemnation of Assad? Like Dan you’re caught in some sort of mass hypnotic state it seems to me. https://www.bitchute.com/video/RIzxcU8nBYQX/ ..people in general seemed to be unconcerned about the death toll among the elderly and considered 'freedom to shop' (sarc) as more important. Willem in particular introducing this belief in the concept of Barrington Declaration, which imo is right-wing tosh. Good grief. It’s the idiot response to COVID which has forced the ‘freedom to shop’ in Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury’s and the like while destroying everything else. I couldn’t care less about these horrible corporations and their profits. But these are the new friends of the left, because they “care” about the health of the population. As for caring for the old and vulnerable, tens of thousands of deaths are down to the panic policy of medical officials shoving old infected patients from hospitals into care homes. And now these same criminals want to push “vaccines” down people’s throats — even though they clearly don’t work while their adverse effects are killing thousands (and speaking of being unconcerned about human suffering, here is a prime example of such behaviour). Reserve your ire for those responsible instead of pointing the finger to those who dare to raise criticisms. |