- Re: As Sinister Burt writes the inverse percentages are a significant part of the population
Posted by Jamie
on November 11, 2021, 7:23 am, in reply to "Re: As Sinister Burt writes the inverse percentages are a significant part of the population"
|
The figures are skewed as already stated. Why take figures from January when most weren't vaccinated? Why not believe Ioannidis? Before he deviated from the narrative, he was the darling of the epidemiological world. No I cannot point out where 150,000 have died from the jab, but then I haven't suggested they have. That said, have 150,000 really died exclusively from Covid? You are using ONS figures that use a test not fit for purpose. Even the CDC are stopping its use come December. The absolute efficacy of the supposed vaccines, as reported by the BMJ, is less than 1%. The much-touted figure of 95% is relative efficacy and a number crunching par excellence.. |