Re: Lennon v Emerson 1969 Archived Message Posted by sinister burt on July 4, 2022, 11:39 am, in reply to "Re: Lennon v Emerson 1969" I mean to be fair to him, he was a pop star - he could have been a lot worse (look at the ones we've got now, not that I know who any of them are) - no one gives Herman's hermits this much grief. Seriously though, apparent liberalism aside, not wanting to take part in war can be pretty revolutionary in itself, ('what if there was a war and nobody came'?) - the closest we've got now is Liam gallagher saying a nice thing about Corbyn (and noel saying a horrible one) (I jest, we have political artists/activists - just struggle to think of any mainstream ones). Anyway, seems like a good excuse to repost this video of ben Shapiro being owned by Lennon from beyond the grave: Message Thread: Lennon v Emerson 1969 - Sir Michael Mouse July 3, 2022, 5:46 pm She's a female version of William F. Buckley. - Morrissey July 3, 2022, 7:55 pm Re: Lennon v Emerson 1969 - Ian M July 3, 2022, 10:56 pm Re: Lennon v Emerson 1969 - Sir Michael Mouse July 3, 2022, 11:14 pm It didn't go down well in Woodhouse - Keith-264 July 4, 2022, 10:24 am Re: Lennon v Emerson 1969 - sinister burt July 4, 2022, 11:39 am Seems very 1969 - Shyaku July 5, 2022, 4:34 pm Re: Seems very 1969 - Sinister Burt July 6, 2022, 1:50 pm   Searching