Re: Sorry, Royal Institute, not Royal Society... (nm) Archived Message
Posted by sinister burt on July 14, 2022, 8:16 am, in reply to "Sorry, Royal Institute, not Royal Society... (nm)"
This video's from a while back - I saw it and thought, what's the bloody fuss about? I'm still not seeing the big conspiracy that GZ implied tbh (and they did imply one, suggesting the whole of bread tube was somehow tainted (well Dore did at least, using it to discredit a shaun video that criticised him fairly)). She got no money according to her from the RI for a video she would have made anyway. It shouldn't be surprising that the state might want to promote its own viewpoint - is there any inaccurate info in there is the more important question? Has thorn lied for her supposed paymasters? Would she have made a video she didn't agree with? (even if there was money, she makes enough already). The alternative viewpoint is often being promoted with dodgy money too (I'd probably trust the RI before the fossil fuel funded brownstone institute or the GBD (Valent not so much)) - I wouldn't use that funding of some of the sources on its own as an argument against what they claim (though it's a consideration of course). Anyway, I see no there there.
|
|