Really? Anyone can provide peer reviewed papers that demolish the argument but big pharma, etc, etc. Nah. He's got a dodgy tagline and then it's on to admittedly (to some extent) true stuff about "those who controlled the narrative" but absolutely no engagement whatsover with all of the counter arguments he made about RFK's claims which is the point of the original post and the thread I posted.
That's without the hypocrisy of going on about "smearing anyone who asks questions" when that's exactly what you did about the poster of the Twitter thread (except he's questioning RFK theories) and the only response I noted in the same thread.
This kind of thing is why I really can't be arsed with this stuff.
I think I'll leave it there; believe or ignore what you want to. There's plenty of information in those links that make RFK's claims look extremely dodgy.