Re: One on one with akala would be useful debate. 📂 Archived Message Posted by RaskolnikovX on September 21, 2025, 8:53 pm, in reply to "One on one with akala would be useful debate. " I doubt his handlers would let him be exposed to any proper debate; Akala would destroy him. Lowkey would be another one who'd expose him. This is still my favourite clip of ten-names: https://x.com/LetsStopC9/status/1966831498553946609 Message Thread: Anyone know if yaxley has ever had a live debate with anyone of political competence? - focus September 21, 2025, 5:54 pm Re: Anyone know if yaxley has ever had a live debate with anyone of political competence? - Ed September 21, 2025, 6:08 pm There's Akala from about 12 years ago - sashimi September 21, 2025, 7:17 pm I see Rask's already mentioned it above (nm) - sashimi September 21, 2025, 7:20 pm Re: There's Akala from about 12 years ago - RaskolnikovX September 21, 2025, 7:46 pm One on one with akala would be useful debate. - focus September 21, 2025, 7:52 pm Re: One on one with akala would be useful debate. - RaskolnikovX September 21, 2025, 8:53 pm Speaking of Lowkey, always useful to have this bookmarked - RaskolnikovX September 21, 2025, 8:56 pm agreed re handlers Also, Low-key on a different level nm - focus September 21, 2025, 9:19 pm Lowkey's no slouch, e.g.: - sashimi September 22, 2025, 5:08 am « Index   Searching