Re: @ceemac note: Historian Schlanger is a LaRouche spokesman fwiw .. 📂 Archived Message
Posted by t on December 27, 2025, 7:28 pm, in reply to "Re: @ceemac note: Historian Schlanger is a LaRouche spokesman fwiw .."
If it hadn,t already been made clear 10 mins of Prof Schlanger would have made it perfectly obvious that he was Larouchian.. Beg pardon c, I have always been puzzled with your reference to LaRouchian philosophy, so to speak, since there was no solid, concrete example that was on offer your end. 300 years of history re-interpreted through a lens of conspiracy. You mean men sitting in a room making plans (I don't particularly want to post Parenti's vid on that subject). Clinton's Rhodes scholarship is meaningless? Convince me otherwise. As to Oxford dons beavering away, when did that come in? as K264 says. Give me a break, Mi(x) was working on this in cahoots with the City. No academia in sight. Therefore, what would be an alternative to this LaRouchiean conspiracy? Just curious in your take.
|
|