Re: Craig Murray is in court on the ludicrous contempt charge
Posted by George Brennan on July 7, 2020, 2:47 pm, in reply to "Re: Craig Murray is in court on the ludicrous contempt charge"
As far as I can find the BBC never reported the significant fact that most of the jury that cleared Salmond were women. It was either 9 out of 13 or seven out 13 since two unspecified jurers were withdrawn from the 15 for mysterious reasons. The verdict was a majority verdict but I have not found what that majority was. Is it known? |
BBC tells us only that verdict was ‘devastating” for the 9 complainants and hinted heavily that the truth against Salmond had not come out.
But the jury believed the prosecution that “something don’t smell right about the whole thing” Ancient misdeeds had been inflated and orchestrated to transform an office bounder into a serial rapist.
This was not just shesaidhesaid. The Scottish “not guilty” amounts to “proven innocent.” A case where innocence could be proven in 12 out of 13 cases must surely have been so weak that it should never have been brought, except for smelly reasons. It is Craig Murrays nose that got him into trouble