Matt Kennard with Jeremy Corbyn on the campaign against him
Posted by Raskolnikov on August 15, 2022, 10:27 am
Not sure I saw this posted here but apologies if it was. Very interesting although K264 will have told us so
[url=
...no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
It's strange hearing him; from all the press coverage you'd expect him to be smacking himself in the head with a rock shouting, "I love terrorists me!"
Still, at least Kieves will save us... ...no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
Kennard should have asked Corbyn why he hadn't publicly defended loyal supporters like Chris Williamson, Jackie Walker, Ken Livingstone, Tony Greenstein and dozens more against the smears of antisemitism. Why had he let them down and not gone on the attack against the disgusting Hodge and Mann?
And also, although Corbyn claims to be (and genuinely is I believe) a supporter of Assange, how could he be unaware that Starmer as DPP had been instrumental in pursuing the vendetta against Assange and warning the Swedish legal team in case they were thinking of backing down, "Don't you dare get cold feet!!!"
So how could Corbyn possibly place his trust in such a solid establishment drone, given his fealty to the state? Was it ignorance, delusion or naivety?It will cost the UK taxpayer £132bn to decommission all the UK’s civil nuclear sites and the work will not be completed for another 120 years, according to latest estimates. Report -- May 2022:
Re: Questions not asked
Posted by Ian M on August 15, 2022, 7:43 pm, in reply to "Questions not asked"
Yes, that was my main issue with the interview after thinking about it for a while. Kennard lets Corbyn off the hook by allowing the story to be about his victimhood and how the Bad Establishment was out to get him. Well, it was, but Corbyn collaborated with it when he endorsed the smear campaign and denounced his own supporters, leading to their expulsion from the party. If you look at the outcomes and consequences for real people, there's not actually that much difference between his tenure & Starmer's, as much as it pains me to say it. Maybe it's even worse than that, because you expect an establishment puke like Starmer to sell you down the river, but Corbyn? A man who had campaigned on Palestine for decades? He should have been the first to defend comrades being smeared in the way Zionists always smear pro-Palestine activists. With him caving in and agreeing with the Zionist point of view, who else was going to stand up for them within the Labour party?
As ever, disclaimers that he was in a difficult/impossible position and it's doubtful that anyone could stand their ground against the kind of no-holds-barred campaign to crush him. Still...
As ever, disclaimers that he was in a difficult/impossible position and it's doubtful that anyone could stand their ground against the kind of no-holds-barred campaign to crush him.
Mick Lynch would have.It will cost the UK taxpayer £132bn to decommission all the UK’s civil nuclear sites and the work will not be completed for another 120 years, according to latest estimates. Report -- May 2022:
He was his and his supporters' worst enemy.Clio the cat, ? July 1997 - 1 May 2016 Kira the cat, ? ? 2010 - 3 August 2018 Jasper the Ruffian cat ? ? ? - 4 November 2021
on August 15, 2022, 10:27 am