Book review shows the fruadian's hypocrisy in massive shining letters
Posted by RaskolnikovX on September 21, 2023, 2:14 pm
This isn't directly related to anything previously posted but as I read it the difference between how the situation the author cited and the Brand pile-on absolutely jumped out at me:
Political scientist Yascha Mounk begins his fifth book with a story about an elementary school in Atlanta that, in 2020, began segregating classes by race on supposedly progressive grounds. “This story sounds depressingly familiar,” he writes, while in fact it sounds very unfamiliar, and made headlines across the world as a result. It is still a matter of open investigation, so it is impossible to know what exactly was going on. Nonetheless he pulls Mary Lin Elementary into a constellation that includes schools and universities that have healing spaces, affinity and advocacy groups – some of them just sound like workshops – based on race, and concludes: “In place of universalism, parts of the American mainstream are quickly adopting a form of progressive separatism.”
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. That's how it works now is it? No investigation yet, no conclusions drawn, no think pieces penned, you "can't know exactly what was going on", right Guardian? Right?.......
As for the review, it continues in the same vein with Williams frantically decrying everything he says. It all feels like someone sitting on top of a sandcastle throwing stones at the incoming tide....no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
Re: Book review shows the fruadian's hypocrisy in massive shining letters
Lefty/liberals in the Guardian can't get their heads around the idea that stuff that they think and do, might actually be barmy and harmful, and could well be looked back on as borderline insane.
Like given incredibly powerful sex blocking drugs to children in puberty because of the latest fashionable ideas about gender and sexuality.
these bullshit poses aren't going to get them drummed out of the hereditary middle class.Clio the cat, ? July 1997 - 1 May 2016 Kira the cat, ? ? 2010 - 3 August 2018 Jasper the Ruffian cat ? ? ? - 4 November 2021
Re: Book review shows the fruadian's hypocrisy in massive shining letters
Like given incredibly powerful sex blocking drugs to children in puberty because of the latest fashionable ideas about gender and sexuality.
Gulp. Can you please cite the study/case please and how prelevant this may be. It sounds a tad iffy, unless it is in the *un and like. Not having a go etc. Just curious.
Re: Book review shows the fruadian's hypocrisy in massive shining letters
"Gulp. Can you please cite the study/case please and how prelevant this may be. It sounds a tad iffy, unless it is in the *un and like. Not having a go etc. Just curious."
In Scotland the madness is run at the Sandyford Clinic where they have been giving puberty blockers out to children as young as 9....whats worse is that they did so knowing that a large proportion of these children were on the autistic spectrum:
Thanks, I was looking for statistics and given this:
Mental health conditions like depression were present in 37 per cent and only six out of 64 young people eligible for fertility preservation completed the process.
Fertility preservation? Perhaps I need to read it tomorrow, and see if it makes any sense.
I guess I was looking for the figures, as in, how many subjects, what was the the treatment and ultimately what was the outcome ... and what were the headlines : ).
Re: Book review shows the fruadian's hypocrisy in massive shining letters
I guess I was looking for the figures, as in, how many subjects, what was the the treatment and ultimately what was the outcome.
-Its ongoing with many treatments and doubtless studies. There's extensive available material on Google if you are seriously interested: most of it US in origin.
I'm sure the Tavistock clinic will have the numbers up to present for England and Wales. On "Outcomes" doubtless in their view it will all have been a roaring success. "Happiness" or "well being" are subjective issues and also subject to change over time. There is of course no real objective yardstick available for comparison. Someone happy to receive castration or a double mastectomy at an early age might... um perhaps somewhat regret that at a later date.
"...only six out of 64 young people eligible for fertility preservation completed the process."
-Yes that left me at a bit of a loss too. Hard to say if its the tabloid press making an arse of it or somewhat contrary bizarre jargon coming from the clinic itself: I posted that article merely to show they were dishing these out to extremely young children here.
Not being a fan of post-modernism, post-truth and 'Woke' in general on the Gender clash I've been reading Lisa Davis Selin's Substack on this issue and what's published about female puberty blockers don't come across as positive, and that includes those youngsters who have taken them for an actual medical condition, rather than a psychological disorder. But, when in Court or legislatures these advocates of puberty blockers lie and lie and lie, i.e., allegedly they ain't harmful, despite the fact that adverse effects are documented and lodged with the authorities, other long-term effects are only recently coming out the woodwork as the original group prescribed these drugs move into their 30's. Anyhow, no need for me to bang on, better to go to Substack and follow links provided, none of which augur well for the LBGTQAXZ fanatics: https://lisaselindavis.substack.com/
on September 21, 2023, 2:14 pm