A helpful "Exaplainer" (propaganda bulletin without any pretence at reportage) notable for what is absent in the article.
Given this is the line up of "experts" that created the "guide":
Expert from the Antisemitism Policy Trust, Full Fact, Tell Mama, the Community Security Trust, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), the Global Network on Extremism and Technology and the political analyst Arieh Kovler produced the guide, which provides examples of eight common conspiracies proliferating in the UK.
it's odd that the report only mentions QAnon, The Great Reset, The Great Replacement, 5G, and "The War in Ukraine" the latter with a very odd framing that I don't think I've heard even the maddest of mouth breathers use : "Pro-Russia narratives, sometimes tied in with antisemitic messaging, have sought to portray the invasion as countering power-grabs by global elites."
So many zionist stooges in the list of "experts" and yet almost no mention of you know who and you know what.
Other articles on the "guide", but not the fraudian, contain this quote:
Danny Stone, chief executive of the Antisemitism Policy Trust, said: “One doesn’t have to fall particularly far down any conspiracy theory rabbit hole before finding antisemitic themes, tropes or ideas.”
Another line I saw, again not in the fraudian "explainer", "Research from King’s College London has also identified a link between belief in conspiracy theories and antisemitism."
I haven't managed to track the actual "guide" down yet (none of the articles actually have a link, so I guess the plebs are to know about it but not see it), but I'm guessing the main meat of it will be a lot of Israel related propaganda ("It's not an apartheid state", etc.) crammed in with madness like QAnon to try and discredit apartheid-state-critical views.
Anybody managing to track a copy down please post a link here. ...no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
Re: What conspiracy theories are UK MPs being told to look out for?
"Mordaunt described the proliferation as deeply disturbing, adding: “If they go unchallenged, we risk the public being conned and their wellbeing potentially damaged.”"
Does Penny Dormant ever listen to herself? What a fekking gaslighter!
Who would have thunked this yesterday? I am glad to know that the Big Pharma, has, in the guise of AstraZeneca this time, profited from their product despite eventually-produced evidence that the product was essentially dodgy. And there was I, going on about mrna, the wunderwaffe tool that needed some answers in certain categories. Whatever.
So the reason given by "them" is that the particular vaccine they withdrew has been superseded by other releases and isn't selling anymore. They had admitted to this thrombosis issues in 2-3 of 100,000 people.
I realise the usual response would be, "Well they would say that; it's big Pharma/media they lie and they lie and they lie..." but if they were still selling hundreds of thousands of units of this every month do you really think they'd withdraw it because of that incident rate?
Their track record of putting profit above people suggests not, so the framing of "Astrazenica pulls vaccine because of side effect" is really "Astrazenica pulls vaccine because they aren't making any money off it".
This doesn't remove the fact that there is a side effect and whatever they said about that earlier (I don't follow this closely enough to be able to cite it) but it is definitely a case of "the framing changes the story"....no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
Re: they are downgrading covid from a mortal sin to a disease
Their track record of putting profit above people suggests not, so the framing of "Astrazenica pulls vaccine because of side effect" is really "Astrazenica pulls vaccine because they aren't making any money off it".
On that side of the ledger, regarding profit, Pfizer is likely to have been a strong competitor, w/help from Ursula von der Leyen (there are stories on her connection Pfizer on the web). Competition/budget and all that.
Probably parsing the negative effects in 'traditional' vacc (as in AstraZeneca) and the mrna 'treatment' could clarify that issue. An expert advice is needed + someone that can follow the money.
on May 8, 2024, 7:01 am