I would love it if he won Starmer's seat! In reality I can't see them allowing it even if he had an actual chance. Thing is, if they could hear this kind of half hour of truth they might come around.
He's very effective; informed, direct, precise and painfully truthful.
His work on the death (arms) industry is excellent....no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
by if they could hear this kind of half hour of truth they might come around I mean the voters, not the Starmeroids; they are too far gone....no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
I think there definitely is hope of him getting a good vote in that constituency. Even perhaps a winning vote if Galloway can do it. But I guess he won’t get free air time. And there is always this nagging feeling of how easy it is to bend an election: In Galloway’s seat, Labor essentially stood-down. Starmer by contrast is essentially the security services on steroids. They have form, and he is annointed.
If Feinstein genuinely had a chance to rid Holborn of Starmer, you can be sure Keith's handlers would ensure enough postal votes were on hand to ensure Keith remained in position - this election is a coronation and the security state will ensure it remains one.
Re: Postal Vote Fraud
Posted by Ken Waldron on June 4, 2024, 11:08 am, in reply to "Postal Vote Fraud"
"This election is a coronation and the security state will ensure it remains one."
-Yea: he's their guy thorough and through. Hopefully this though will give Feinstein a higher critical media profile.
Saw a poll the other day asking if the public would have preferred someone other than Sunak/ Starmer: 58% said yes. They aren't fooled.
The winners celebrations will echo hollow throughout the land...
You can just imagine that a love child will pop up at some point in the next few days or weeks. Or someone claiming to be such. Like a mixed-race person.
But I so so agree with you on his great strengths in the face of satan.
(B) Or that religion was involved in that struggle
(C) Or that the Israeli economy depends on Palestinians the way the SA one relied on black Africans
In other words, they are not actually comparable struggles.
Re: I don’t think
Posted by Ian M on June 3, 2024, 11:28 pm, in reply to "I don’t think"
Indeed, re: point C Chomsky has argued similarly, eg: this from the Cast Lead era:
'Take, say, the term “apartheid.” In the Occupied Territories, what Israel is doing is much worse than apartheid. To call it apartheid is a gift to Israel, at least if by “apartheid” you mean South African-style apartheid. What’s happening in the Occupied Territories is much worse. There’s a crucial difference. The South African Nationalists needed the black population. That was their workforce. It was 85 percent of the workforce of the population, and that was basically their workforce. They needed them. They had to sustain them. The bantustans were horrifying, but South Africa did try to sustain them. They didn’t put them on a diet. They tried to keep them strong enough to do the work that they needed for the country. They tried to get international support for the bantustans.
The Israeli relationship to the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories is totally different. They just don’t want them. They want them out, or at least in prison. And they’re acting that way. That’s a very striking difference, which means that the apartheid analogy, South African apartheid, to the Occupied Territories is just a gift to Israeli violence. It’s much worse than that. If you look inside Israel, there’s plenty of repression and discrimination. I’ve written about it extensively for decades. But it’s not apartheid. It’s bad, but it’s not apartheid. So the term, I just don’t think is applicable.' - https://www.democracynow.org/2014/8/8/noam_chomsky_what_israel_is_doing
Stuck with me, as well as the way Israel apologists freely make comparisons with native americans when trying to get the US onside - as in "you wouldn't consider giving land back to the native Americans, why would we consider it with the Palestinians". A sign of their comfort with the same kind of genocidal 'solutions' as were implemented in the Americas towards the indigenous population. As we see.
on June 3, 2024, 10:37 am