If you’ve read my previous pieces on the Charlie Kirk murder, I would hope you agree the official story is so full of holes, it can’t possibly be accurate. So if Tyler Robinson is innocent, or if he was groomed to be the killer, we need to figure out who was behind it, and the evidence is pointing in a very predictable direction: towards Israel.
I’m not gonna sit here and pretend I can explain exactly what happened on 10 September because I was not there and it seems there were multiple decoys to throw us off. I can easily believe Robinson was groomed by Israel, but I can also believe he had nothing to do with the killing. We’ll just have to see what information emerges next on that front.
What I can say is there has been excellent journalism done by the Grayzone and others to figure out Israel’s apparent involvement. For those of you who don’t know, multiple sources have confirmed that Charlie Kirk was fearing for his life after questioning Netanyahu and Israel.
Here is what Kirk’s friend, Infowars host Harrison H. Smith said:
Kirk had begun criticising Israel and spoke of “Jewish control” over US institutions. He became convinced that Israel was funding progressive culture in universities, which is ironic because it is the left who have been most vocally critical of Israel. He was also concerned about Israel’s influence on US foreign policy and opposed war with Iran. He had grown to despise Netanyahu, regarding him as a “bully”. He was bombarded by angy text messages from Turning Point donors for turning against Israel.
Here is what Zionists thought of him:
Kirk witnessed how Netanyahu exerted influence over the Trump administration through people like Miriam Adelson (who bankrolled his election campaigns, spending a quarter of a billion dollars). He believed that Trump was afraid of Israel, in particular because Israeli spies had planted devices on his vehicles and phone. They did something similar to Boris Johnson.
Kirk was head of Turning Point USA, America’s leading organisation for young conservatives. He was once an ardent Zionist, but his problem was that only 24% of young Republicans sympathise with Israel over its genocide. Kirk was not in sync with his audience and that likely swayed him on Israel more than his conscience, although it could have been both.
Almost immediately after Kirk’s death, Zionist Ben Shapiro was put in charge of Turning Point USA. The aim was surely to bring young conservatives back over to Israel’s side, but it could easily have the opposite effect. Rather than saving Israel, this might simply kill Turning Point. I can’t see Ben Shapiro winning over genocide opponents, can you?
Shapiro had criticised Turning Point for being a “broad church” and said the following in an apparent swipe at Kirk, three days before his murder:
“Just because you’re saying somebody votes Republican, that doesn’t mean that they ought to be the preacher at the front of the church. They’re not the person that ought to be leading the movement, if they are spending all day criticising the President of the United States as ‘covering up a Mossad rape ring’ or ‘being a tool of the Israelis for hitting an Iranian nuclear facility.’”
Does that read like an admission to you? Like they had to get rid of Kirk because he was causing too many problems?
Here is a clip of Kirk arguing that: “The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.”
One interesting point about this clip is that Kirk saw the Anti-defamation League as “left wing”. I doubt anyone on the left would agree with that statement, but perhaps the ADL has been pissing off the right as much as the left. It seems they are one of the groups driving the culture war to keep us fighting.
It seems clear that Israel wanted to bring Kirk back under its control, and if it couldn’t, wanted rid of him.
A Trump insider and long time friend of Kirk’s told the Grayzone Kirk had rejected a funding offer from Netanyahu to buy Turning Point USA (the rumoured sum is $150 million). He also declined an invitation to meet with Netanyahu two weeks before his death.
Kirk apparently saw all this as an attempt to stop his criticisms of Israel:
“Bibi tried to buy me off, but I told him Turning Point isn’t for sale. He doesn’t get to control what I say about Israel.”
Kirk was said to be “angry and afraid” at the potential backlash from Israeli lobbyists. He was said to be “frightened” and “tormented” and feeling resentful towards Trump’s inner-circle. It has been widely claimed that Kirk said the following on a podcast:
“I’m not saying Israel let October 7 happen, but it’s weird how it was used to justify everything they’ve done since. Something doesn’t add up.”
Here is a clip of Kirk expressing scepticism on the events of 7 October, explaining Israel had been on the brink of civil war and Netanyahu was redefining the constitution to reduce the power of the judicial branch. Kirk asked if there was a stand down order on 7 October as Jews were being killed on live stream.
Kirk’s friend and Israel critic Candace Owens is one of the people who has lent credence to the claims Kirk was turning against Israel, saying he was going through a “spiritual transformation” and was under a “lot of pressure” and “fighting for custody of his own life”. She accused Bill Ackman of threatening Kirk and said:
“They wanted him to lose everything for changing or even slightly modifying an opinion. It’s very hurtful to me.”
Owens explained that her own interactions with Israeli lobbyists were similar to Kirk’s experiences and invitations often “felt like a threat”. She described the offer for Kirk to visit Netanyahu as being like an invite to a “re-education camp”.
I think it’s safe to say we’ve established that Kirk was sceptical and afraid of Netanyahu so now let’s delve a little deeper into why.
Kirk had warned Trump not to attack Iran and his intervention might have been what stopped the US from launching a full invasion. We are told Kirk was possibly the only person connected to Trump talking him out of war. If this is true, it’s not hard to see why Netanyahu was furious with him.
The Grayzone reports on a meeting Kirk had with Bill Ackman and others (the meeting Candace Owens was referring to above). Kirk was reportedly upset after the meeting turned into an intervention.
Pro-Israel lobbyists met with Kirk at the Hamptons in early August 2025 and five witnesses have painted a picture of what took place. They say Kirk was presented with a detailed list of his supposed transgressions against Israel. It’s unclear what was on that list, but it’s a safe bet it’s similar to what has been outlined above.
Ackman was allegedly furious about Kirk’s ties to Tucker Carlson, who mocked Ackman for having no skills, and the comedian Dave Smith, who had critised Israel’s genocide and discussed Mossad/Epstein at a Turning Point event.
Bill Ackman and Nastasha Hausdorff (of UK Lawyers for Israel) are alleged to have screamed at Kirk. Ackman allegedly told Kirk to rescind his invitation for Tucker Carlson (another Zionist turned Israel critic) to speak at the coming America Fest (Amfest) 2025. Kirk felt he was being blackmailed.
AF (America First) Post reports that:
Tucker Carlson said that Charlie Kirk told him at a TPUSA Student Action Summit last July to highlight Epstein’s connections to Mossad. Distinguishing between Netanyahu and the State of Israel, Carlson claimed that Kirk hated Netanyahu and his war against Gaza despite loving Israel, and that Kirk was “tormented” until the day he died by Zionist donors for platforming Carlson at his event. Two days before Kirk’s death, Carlson revealed that Kirk lost a $2 million donation for pledging to platform him at TPUSA’s December AmericaFest conference.
Here is a video to substantiate this:
Tucker Carlson says he is disgusted with how Netanyahu has used Kirk’s memory, given that Kirk disliked him so strongly. Netanyahu has spoken about Kirk as though the two were close friends, but it seems nothing could be further from the truth. Carlson says Kirk was disgusted that Israel was using the US to prosecute Israel’s wars.
Kirk invited Marjorie Taylor Greene (someone who has called for AIPAC to be registered as a foregn agent) to speak at AmFest. She suggested that Kirk was keen for the pair to speak against Israel.
Israel has lost Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, it was losing Charlie Kirk, and it was dealing with the emergence of conservative voices like Dave Smith who are increasingly critical of Israel. Given young conservatives are turning against the genocide, you can see how this is a huge, even existential problem for Zionism. It’s one thing for Israel to lose the left, quite another for it to lose the right.
Another conservative who Israel seems to be losing is Megyn Kelly, someone else who felt “threatened and intimidated” by Israel. In the past, such people have fallen silent, but now they are increasingly speaking out, and when the public sees that Israel is threatening even its allies, that’s terrible PR.
Kirk was interviewed by Megyn Kelly shortly before his death and he expressed deep frustration at the pressure Israeli lobbyists had been putting him under.
“It’s all of the sudden: ‘Oh, Charlie: he’s no longer with us.’ Wait a second - what does ‘with us’ mean, exactly? I’m an American, okay? I represent this country.”
Kirk then addressed Israel’s lobbyists directly:
“The more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated - it would be one thing if it were just one text, or two texts, it is dozens of texts - then we start to say, ‘Whoa, hold the boat here’.”
He added:
“I have less ability… to criticise the Israeli government than actual Israelis do. And that’s really, really weird.”
It’s interesting to note the meeting at the Hamptons came just before Kirk’s interview with Megyn Kelly, which explains why he expressed his frustations to her.
It is undeniable that Israel was putting Kirk under immense pressure, making him feel afraid for his safety. So now that has been established, let’s look at how Israel pounced on the story of Kirk’s death.
Almost immediately after Kirk was shot, Netanyahu was blaming “radical Islamists and ultra-progressives” without a shred of evidence. Other Israeli politicians jumped in, making similar comments as though they could not wait to pounce. All of them were insisting Kirk was a great friend of Israel, like they hadn’t sent their pitbulls to maul him at the Hamptons.
Here is a quote from Itamir Ben Gvir:
“The collusion between the global Left and radical Islam is the greatest danger to humanity today. Charlie Kirk saw the danger and warned about it. But the bullets of the despicable murderer struck him. Thank you, Charlie, for your support of Israel and for your struggle for a better world. My condolences to the family, to his dear wife and children, to President Trump, and to the American nation. Rest in peace Charlie, may your memory be a blessing!”
Given Kirk’s relationship to Netanyahu and Israeli lobbyists, this attempt to rewrite that relationship is frankly obscene. And Israel’s attempts to create a narrative out of this should leave anyone suspicious.
Ask yourself, when have Israeli politicians reacted so vocally to a political assassination in the US? It’s not long since politician Melissa Hortman was assassinated and they did not react like this, but they did for an influencer?
Clearly, they want to use this killing for their own ends. One of those ends includes putting Ben Shapiro in charge of Turning Point USA. Another includes social media censorship.
Israel has recently installed a former IDF soldier called Erica Mindel as “hate speech manager” at TikTok. Already, the app is banning people from saying things such as “the IDF is a terrorist organisation”. TikTok user YourFavouriteGuy had a series of videos discussing Kirk, Israel, and groypers removed from the platform. Other users have reported similar issues.
Ask yourself if you think it’s a stretch that the people who were behind the Epstein paedophile ring, who bribe and blackmail politicians and influencers, who have taken over TikTok and imposed censorship, would kill someone to serve their politicial aims.
The Trump administration is talking about shutting down left-wing organisations and designating groups such as Antifa as domestic terrorist organisations. They even want to prosecute people who support or fund such groups, kind’a like the UK does with Palestine Action. Given there is no such group as Antifa, this one might prove difficult! Trump claims the “radical left” is directly responsible for the terrorism we’re seeing in the US today. What terrorism?
JD Vance has decided that George Soros is somehow behind all this and wants to go after any organisation he is involved with. He claimed Soros and others are funding “political violence” and “writers who take quotes out of context”. I assume he sees these two things as equivalent and is more concerned about going after the writers.
Rep Clay Higgins is talking about lifetime social media bans, business blacklisting, and school expulsions for anyone who has belittled Kirk. He even wants to revoke people’s driving licences because saying mean things about dead people is unacceptable… apart from all those times when Charlie Kirk spoke about George Floyd…
US Attorney General Pam Bondi is insisting the US has no room for hate speech, even though the First Amendment clearly says otherwise:
“There's free speech and then there's hate speech… We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
If Bondi was actually talking about hate speech that would be one thing, but she is clearly talking about disrespecting Kirk or Israel. She is even demanding people be fired:
"Employers, you have an obligation to get rid of people who are saying horrible things.”
The Charlie Kirk Data Foundation (previously Charlie Kirk’s Murderers) is bragging that it has doxxed nearly 60,000 people. Huge numbers of employers are being contacted with a demand that people be fired for their social media posts. Interestingly, they only seem to be targeting the left.
Conservatives like Laura Loomer said bad things about Kirk, and publications like the Times Of Israel even called him evil, but that’s all forgotten now.
Loomer has called for Trump to “shut down, defund and prosecute every single leftist organisation” and treat the left as a "national security threat." She has called for the left to be jailed to “take away their power for generations to come”.
Loomer had called Kirk a traitor and put a target on his back, but this not about Kirk, it’s about political affiliation. In Trump’s America, you are only allowed to be conservative, and Zionist, of course.
Some Zionists think doxxing and writing to employers and shutting down orginsations and jailing people is not enough: they want a genocide in the US.
Trump organiser Ali Alexander has called for the mass arrests of up to 500,000 people with the “possible death penalty”. Conservative social media users have been foaming at the mouth as they call for violence against the left without the slightest sense of self-awareness.
Regardless of whether Israel was involved in the killing of Charlie Kirk, several things are clear: the first is that it wields enormous political influence through bribery, intimidation, and blackmail. The second is that Charlie Kirk was turning against Israel and feared for his life. The third is that Israel, along with the Trump regime, is using Kirk’s death to fulfil political objectives.
Given all of the above, I put it to you that it’s highly likely Israel was involved in Charlie Kirk’s death. What do you think?The last working-class hero in England. Clio the cat, ? July 1997 - 1 May 2016 Kira the cat, ? ? 2010 - 3 August 2018 Jasper the Ruffian cat ??? - 4 November 2021 Georgina the cat ???-4 December 2025
The FBI's "evidence" against Tyler Robinson has now reached comical levels
As I pointed out previously, the FBI seems to be piecing together a narrative to fulfil the political objectives of the Trump administration. They quickly pivoted from Tyler Robinson being a far-right groyper from a good Christian family to him being a radical leftist who lives in the city with his transgender girlfriend and is so deep into online culture that he has… no digital footprint. Fucking plot holes…
The evidence was non-existent so they had to come up with something quick, and that’s exactly what they did. Only they came up with it a little too quick. As a writer, I cannot emphasise enough the importance of proof readers. They can help you avoid looking like an idiot!
We now have a transcript of Tyler Robinson supposedly texting with his transgender partner and it is the most contrived script you’ve ever seen in your life. It reads like Kash Patel and Grok cobbled it together after a few too many beers and accidentally hit send before they had sobered up.
A Twitter user called Evan Kilgore put the transcript through ChatGPT which concluded it was most likely fake based on all the incriminating things crammed into one chat, as well as the weird mix of writing styles. It concluded the script was probably written with the help of AI.
The script is both laughable and far too perfect, just like the gigantic rifle wrapped in the towel in a box in the woods. These dipshits just aren’t thinking their fake evidence through.
Candace Owens believes the texts were cherry-picked and selectively edited to frame a narrative. Her rationale is that there are no time stamps for the messages, but they clearly jump forward in time, starting with when campus is in lockdown and moving onto the next day when Robinson is supposedly confessing to his dad.
It could be that Robinson is a patsy and they are deliberately leaving stuff out that would show this, and tweaking the wording to fit their narrative, or it could be the messages are completely fake, or it could be this is a real conversation that a 22-year-old had with the love of his life shortly after committing murder.
Here is the transcript so take a look and decide for yourself:
Robinson: drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard.
[When the roommate looked under the keyboard, there was a note that allegedly read: "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it."]
Robinson: I am still ok my love, but am stuck in orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.
Roommate: you weren't the one who did it right????
Robinson: I am, I'm sorry
Roommate: I thought they caught the person?
Robinson: no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.
Roommate: Why?
Robinson: Why did I do it?
Roommate: Yeah
Robinson: I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out.
Robinson: If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hopefully they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it.
Roommate: How long have you been planning this?
Robinson: a bit over a week I believe. I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it
Robinson: I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle.... I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpas rifle ... idek if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. didn't have the ability or time to bring it with.... I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints. how the [expletive] will I explain losing it to my old man....
only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel....
remember how I was engraving bullets? The [expletive] messages are mostly a big meme, if I see "notices bulge uwu" on fox new I might have a stroke alright im gonna have to leave it, that really [expletive] sucks.... judging from today I'd say grandpas gun does just fine idk. I think that was a $2k scope;-;
Robinson: delete this exchange
Robinson: my dad wants photos of the rifle ... he says grandpa wants to know who has what, the feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. Hes calling me rn, not answering.
Robinson: since trump got into office [my dad] has been pretty diehard maga.
Robinson: Im gonna turn myself in willingly, one of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff.
Robinson: you are all I worry about love
Roommate: I'm much more worried about you
Robinson: don't talk to the media please. don't take any interviews or make any comments. ... if any police ask you questions ask for a lawyer and stay silent
Note how it seems they have contrived something in an attempt to address all of the plot holes in their previous claims?
It’s like someone said: “Shit, they’re picking our story apart. We had better come up with something.”
Remember how we were mocking Kash Patel yesterday for his ludicous word salad about how a note existed about Robinson confessing to the crime, but you can’t see it because it has been destroyed, but we know it existed and we’re not telling you how or why or who destroyed it or how it was destroyed?
Well, now they have come up with something to explain this! Robinson said the note existed in the text messages to his partner! Good work, guys! It’s just a shame this all reads like it was written by someone who has no idea how 22-year-olds text.
In every conversation about Kirk’s killing, every official has acted in the most unprofessional manner. They are supposed to be reserved, and remind us this is an ongoing investigation, and use neutral language to avoid prejudicing a jury.
Instead, you can see the words they want to use almost bursting out of them. “Did you know he is a LEFTIST? His partner is TRANSGENDER. He was into deep, dark REDDIT culture. He left ANTIFA messages! He is obviously fucking GUILTY! KILL HIM!”
They’re piecing together this baseless narrative that being a leftist and being transgender are somehow equivalent to terrorism. They’re pushing this so hard, not because they give a crap about Charlie Kirk, but because their real targets are leftists and transgender people.
You need to understand the so-called culture war is driven from the top to keep the working class divided so we don’t focus our energy on the ruling class. The culture war seemed to be dying, but instead of giving up on it, they’re trying to give us the ultimate culture war. The culture war to end all culture wars. The one where their side comes out reigning supreme and crushes everyone they dislike.
Pam Bondi said: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society... We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."
This is ironic because the conservative line until this point has been the opposite:
What we are seeing is a fascist coup taking place before our eyes and Charlie Kirk is the martyr they need. Here is something that might freak you out: someone predicted how the murder would happen on Twitter. The screenshot is from a real tweet (I’ve checked) and they called it to a tee weeks ago. I would like to remind every conservative, they are your enemies too. They killed Charlie kirk and they would kill any one of you. The ruling class is not ideological. It does not give a fuck about left and right or woke and anti-woke. It cares only about its wealth and power, and will sacrifice any one of us in a heartbeat. It’s time to unite against these bastards.The last working-class hero in England. Clio the cat, ? July 1997 - 1 May 2016 Kira the cat, ? ? 2010 - 3 August 2018 Jasper the Ruffian cat ??? - 4 November 2021 Georgina the cat ???-4 December 2025
on September 17, 2025, 9:44 pm