"Say no to Palantir in the NHS NHS England is rolling out software to run our health records from Palantir – a US spy-tech firm that has supported mass deportation in the US and enabled genocide in Gaza.
One of Palantir’s founders is also openly against the NHS. Peter Thiel claimed it “makes people sick” and said that the British people love the NHS because we’re suffering from Stockholm syndrome.
We can’t let a company like this take control of our healthcare system.
But we can fight back right now. We’ve set up a simple tool so you can find out if your local NHS trust has started using the software, and then send an email demanding they say no to Palantir.
Chartwell Green Surgery Wessex Road West End Southampton SO18 3RA
Dear...
I am writing to complain about the treatment of myself.... by the NHS regarding the new appointments service.
On the 3rd November 2025 I rang Chartwell to make an appt. only to find that a new online appointments system had been instituted that very day. Having first attempted to navigate the new system I immediately rang the practice and tried to explain that without the help of an advocate in such circumstances my elevated stress response makes it very difficult for me to formally address such issues and often causes me to have an MH episode which can vary on a spectrum between; increased anxiety, self-harm threat episodes, panic attacks, full self-harm episodes and other severe behavioral reactions (which is in-fact what happened). The staff merely insisted that I had to fill in the online proforma or could come into the surgery and use a laptop there. I explained that I live alone and have mobility issues (of which the surgery are aware) and that my issue of requiring advocacy would still not be addressed, however, the staff were adamant that they could not otherwise help. As a result I struggled in my attempt to use the online proforma at home and deliberately did not fully engage with some of the questions asked (in order to manage my MH issues). I have been in a very poor psychological state since and am suffering from heightened symptoms of my disorder (this complaints process itself being very challenging for me). Furthermore the proforma questioned me on my employment orientation, something I only discuss with employment advisers in the presence of an advocate, however, there was no alternative but to make some response on the form in order to secure an appointment, something that equates to duress and that I was not expecting. I do not give the NHS permission to use this data (esp. considering the bullying and deceitful way it was acquired) and maintain that both the use of such data and its acquisition constitutes a breach of my human rights and is effectively illegal. I discuss my health condition with my primary health care providers not my employment status unless I choose so to do. As I have stated my health has suffered considerably as a result of being forced to comply with these new strictures and I am seeking redress from the NHS for both the infringement of my rights and the subsequent deterioration in the condition I was seeking medical intervention with. I wish the practice to acknowledge my complaint, to attempt to address my subsequent deterioration and to help me in complaining further regarding this new (and entirely inappropriate) appointment system to the NHS.
I would like you to carry out a full investigation into my concerns and provide a response in accordance with the NHS Complaints Process.
I look forward to hearing from you in due course.
Yours sincerely"
It so happened that I rang the surgery (having been "lost" on an over-stacked "phone-tree" whilst trying to secure an appointment the week before) on the very day the new NHS appointment system was instigated at the surgery and whilst I say such was "unexpected" I was already aware that such breaches of my human rights were being planned by our deeply compromised government (its leadership being subordinate to the strictures of an intensely sinister international -"Globalist"- agenda). The government now intends that DWP work advisers be embedded in our G.P's surgeries. I can't imagine than many surgeries are likely to welcome the intrusion and I question the notion that they can reasonably accommodate same without compromising patient care, this being especially so considering the right of many vulnerable patients to access advocacy when dealing with issues such as employment. The Google AI Overview (that many patients will refer to first for help and advice) is, Mr. Starmer, stunningly clear, quote;
"Safeguarding the right of mental health patients to access employment advocacy involves legal protections, dedicated advocacy services*, and specialised support programmes. Key mechanisms ensure individuals can assert their rights and receive necessary support in the workplace.
Legal Rights and Protections
The primary legal framework in the UK is the Equality Act 2010, which protects individuals with mental health problems from discrimination in employment. A mental health problem is considered a disability under the Act if it has a substantial and long-term impact on day-to-day activities.
Key employment rights include: Protection from direct and indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation by employers. The right to "reasonable adjustments" in the workplace to mitigate disadvantages caused by their condition. Examples include flexible working hours, quiet work areas, or access to therapy appointments during work time. An employer generally cannot ask health questions before making a job offer.
Access to Advocacy Services
Individuals have access to various advocacy services to help them understand and exercise their rights*: Independent Mental Health Advocates (IMHAs): Individuals detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 have a legal right to an IMHA, who helps them understand their rights regarding treatment, detention, and complaints. While their primary role is related to detention and treatment, they ensure patients are aware of all their rights, which includes general access to support services.
Care Act Advocates: Local authorities must provide an advocate to individuals who have substantial difficulty in being involved in decisions about their social care needs and have no one else appropriate to support them*.
Community Advocates/NHS Complaints Advocates: For those who do not qualify for a statutory advocate, general community advocacy services are available to help with various issues, including raising concerns or making choices about health and care services*.
Specialised Employment Advocacy: Able Futures delivers the Access to Work Mental Health Support Service on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), providing nine months of advice from a mental health specialist to help manage mental health at work and work with employers on adjustments.
Organisations like Rethink Mental Illness and local Mind branches offer dedicated employment support services that provide one-to-one support, skills assessments, and advice on disclosure and job retention using models like the Individual and Placement Support (IPS) model.
Safeguarding Mechanisms
Safeguards are in place to ensure these rights and services are accessible: Legal Obligation for Provision: Local authorities and health boards have a legal obligation to ensure advocacy services are available*.
Information Provision: Public authorities and healthcare providers must take reasonable steps to ensure patients are informed of their legal rights and how to access advocacy services.
Challenging Denial of Access: If a person entitled to a statutory advocate (e.g., IMHA) is denied one, they should seek legal advice, as the absence of an advocate can invalidate an assessment or decision.
Confidentiality: Advocacy services offer a confidential space for individuals to discuss their concerns and wishes without fear of dismissal or discrimination.
These measures collectively work to ensure mental health patients are empowered to access the employment advocacy they need to maintain or seek work effectively and fairly*."
*Italics mine.
Are we seriously expected to believe that a "human rights lawyer" was unaware of the legislation regarding such?
So if I venture to see the practice nurse, MH nurse or G.P will I be forced to drag along an advocate on every occasion in-case my rights are otherwise breached by ambush from a DWP "adviser"? It's ludicrous. If not why not just conduct any such interrogations either at the Job Centre or by speaker-phone conference as before? Yet our government ("for evil to flourish all that is necessary is that good -people- should do nothing!") maintains that such is both possible and reasonable; "Job advisers to be embedded in GP surgeries" Go to: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/job-advisers-to-be-embedded-in-gp-surgeries-as-tens-of-thousands-more-sick-and-disabled-people-offered-help-into-work
This idiocy has come about as a result of ableist and eugenicist scapegoating.
on January 24, 2026, 5:04 pm