Do you think if the roles were completely reversed and it had been a Sikh student who had been stabbed by a white teenage and handcuffed by the police as he bled to death that Nigel Farage would have described the incident as one evoking "cold rage"?
Possibly, given his demonisation of E. Europeans, e.g. killing and eating swans
Posted by sashimi on June 3, 2026, 5:34 pm, in reply to "Relevant question?"
Following the conviction of Henry Nowak's murderer Vickram Digwa, Nigel Farage has come out with statements blaming "two-tier policing" anti-white racism and immigration.
The left are condemning Farage for "making it political" and they are wrong to do so, as everything is political. Farage is also wrong, morally and factually.
The police acted appallingly, and the murder was unjustifiable, do not think that I am some kind of apologist.
Two-tier policing has always existed in our country, the two tiers being the ruling class and the rest of us. If the police are taking racist language more seriously than murder, they are doing so because the state wants white workers to think that they are oppressed for being white, not for being workers. It is a distraction technique used to slow the class conflict down, even to try and convince us that it is no longer relevant.
Nigel Farage knows this and he uses it himself. He doesn't care about white workers, or any other workers. He only cares about us voting for him.
This isn't about immigration. Both the victim and his murderer were British. Henry Nowak's family are from Poland, his killer's from India.
Over ten years ago, Farage was blaming East European immigrants for everything from eating swans to causing traffic jams. He even said that he'd rather have Indian and Australian immigrants over Polish or Romanian because they speak English and follow our laws.
He likes immigration when it suits his agenda. Like Oswald Mosley's "good Jews" he tolerates foreigners when they are of his class, when they have money made from the labour of others.
on June 3, 2026, 5:14 pm