It's that image of Morris lying back with a fat complacent smirk that I find most disgusting about him, not the "defence" he tries to tries to put forward. And of course the smirk is very telling -- it's the attitude of a man who knows he is entirely in the wrong, attempting to defend and justify a genocidal apartheid state and knowing it's a hopeless task -- so the only response he's left with is his smirk.He has nothing else. The smirk of a loser and a liar.

If life is short, Jump 32 minutes in to get the serious debate. Piers Morgan deserves credit for allowing Finkelstein a degree of free speech he would not get on any mainstream platform. But he makes scant pretence of impartiality, demanding yes and no answers to complex questions, always prompting the last word.
He did not press Morris to promise that Israel would end illegal occupation the moment Hamas disarmed. Morris says he wants a two state solution, knowing his government will not allow any kind of Palestinian state - unless Uncle Sam orders it to. He knows Illegal occupation of Greater Israel existed for years before the armed resistance that it produced , being being justified by existence of hostile states threatening to drive it into the sea. Iran now serves that purpose; hence, preparing his excuses, Morris’ rant against the massacre of “thirty thousand” peaceful protesters.
Gb