Editorial Pages

Editorial Pages
[ Editorial Pages ]

BBC

Posted by David Cotter on October 24, 2022, 6:22 am

'We are now using this absurd, illogical and total fictitious claim by "The BBC" against its very existence as an entity founded upon anything but lies and obfuscation.'

You're on a hiding to nothing with this one.It is fully documented by BBC and others and his been stated in broadcasts by the BBC and others that it's origins date back to 18 October 1922, when the British Broadcasting Company Limited was formed. Any simple research will openly tell you that. Where are the 'lies and obfuscation'? There are none.

I don't except this to pass your censorship, by the way, because it's not what you want to hear, but, if I may say so, that is also a fact.

Re: BBC

Posted by Admin on October 24, 2022, 9:37 am, in reply to "BBC"
Board Administrator

Clearly you are a buffoon. The entire point of the post is that the origins of "the BBC" DO NOT date back to 18 October 1922 as you so incorrectly stated. "The BBC" you are listening to or watching dates back to 1927. The corporation and the company are two different entities, and while they share the initials 'BBC', so does the Baptist Bible College in Coventry. But any lawyer who understands company law will tell you that a company is separate from a human being, and it is also separate from a Crown 'corporation'. The fact is that John Reith acted illegally by representing both. That was a breach of his fiduciary duty to shareholders. The company was not wound-up until 1929 - by John Reith as Managing Director - while he was Director General of the other BBC. It was the GPO who bought out the first BBC and 'Wikipedia' has a load of rubbish (as usual) on its page. One BBC did not become another BBC. Most of the time your comments are deleted because they are absurd, this one posted by you is not only absurd, but it also represents the dying anoraks who seem to live in a tiny world of their own in which reality does not exist. Therefore, it was accepted to show how ridiculous your comments are as well as the buffoons you seem to represent.

YesterAir

Posted by AgB on March 28, 2023, 4:16 pm, in reply to "Re: BBC"
Edited by board administrator March 29, 2023, 2:40 am

I know I'm stating the obvious but if the media stated the truth nobody would be interested the general public just love scandal,
so why not publish your findings that way(the the press would love it) and maybe it will cause a stir and bring it to public attention!
AgB.

Re: YesterAir

Posted by Admin on March 29, 2023, 2:42 am, in reply to "YesterAir"

The answer to your question is online at http://www.allaboutradiocaroline.co.uk/

Link: http://www.allaboutradiocaroline.co.uk/

Re: YesterAir

Posted by AgB on March 29, 2023, 5:00 pm, in reply to "Re: YesterAir"

Previous Message

The answer to your question is online at http://www.allaboutradiocaroline.co.uk/

the BBC claimed to be 100 in 2022.I noticed an error in your recent update.....
The second rebuttal concerns a claim constantly made by the British Broadcasting Corporation during 2023 that it is now celebrating its centenary, meaning that it became 100 years of age in 2023.

Re: Correction

Posted by Admin on March 30, 2023, 2:23 am, in reply to "Re: YesterAir"
Board Administrator

You are correct. This paragraph was based upon text originally published as our 5th commentary published during 2022 in print form. While the monograph was correct when first published, the reference source should have been included as originally published. Thank you for pointing out this typographical error which has now been corrected.

« Back to index

[ Editorial Pages ]