Posted by Admin on December 2, 2022, 3:16 pm, in reply to "o'rahilly-the man" Board Administrator
If you had asked "have you seen this interview with Ronan in 1964"? We might be impressed IF it was recorded in January of that year.
But it was not. It was recorded in 1984, and unlike anoraks and Ray Anderson feeding off anoraks, we have no "cause" to promote. We are investigative reporters.
Everything so far is more material that has been recycled AFTER the event, and none of the anorak hacks are telling the truth. This is probably due to the fact that they do not know the truth.
NO! I don't know that's why iam reading the blogs,I know an ex Marconi man who says he does know,but he won't share because Mervyn thinks he's an idiot far from it how can a man of that position be. AgB.
Re: o'rahilly the man
Posted by Admin on December 3, 2022, 4:31 am, in reply to "o'rahilly the man" Board Administrator
Okay, then keep reading!
As for your 'Marconi man' comment, we only know of one and we never called him an 'idiot'. In fact, he became very friendly with one of us in sharing what he knew, but our investigation is a continuing investigation and when we began to uncover additional information, he became nervous. He had signed the Official Secrets Act and he is also believer in the British monarchy.
We have not signed that document and we are admirers of John Lilburne and so we detest the British monarchy which is merely a puppet family representing the British Crown corporation sole.
So unfortunately, it led to a break - by him with us, not us with him. He is older than our oldest team member, and he lives on his own with limited means.
He became concerned for his own well-being after he saw where our research was headed. So, he pulled the plug.
We never pulled the plug on him.
The reason why we are not mentioning his name is because you have not mentioned his name, but undoubtedly, we are referring to the same person.
Please send ------ our best wishes for the upcoming holiday season.
We are delighted to know that he is still okay.
Re: o'rahilly the man
Posted by Roger Knight on December 5, 2022, 5:41 am, in reply to "Re: o'rahilly the man"
He is referring to his mentor, Scottg. I would have thought that a "cold case detective" such as you could work that out!
It is not the Georgian man.
Previous Message
Okay, then keep reading!
As for your 'Marconi man' comment, we only know of one and we never called him an 'idiot'. In fact, he became very friendly with one of us in sharing what he knew, but our investigation is a continuing investigation and when we began to uncover additional information, he became nervous. He had signed the Official Secrets Act and he is also believer in the British monarchy.
We have not signed that document and we are admirers of John Lilburne and so we detest the British monarchy which is merely a puppet family representing the British Crown corporation sole.
So unfortunately, it led to a break - by him with us, not us with him. He is older than our oldest team member, and he lives on his own with limited means.
He became concerned for his own well-being after he saw where our research was headed. So, he pulled the plug.
We never pulled the plug on him.
The reason why we are not mentioning his name is because you have not mentioned his name, but undoubtedly, we are referring to the same person.
Please send ------ our best wishes for the upcoming holiday season.
We are delighted to know that he is still okay.
Re: o'rahilly the man
Posted by Admin on December 5, 2022, 6:53 am, in reply to "Re: o'rahilly the man" Board Administrator
Who you are, we don't know, but we are aware of the person you refer to because we have a file on him, but it does not fit the description of a 'Marconi man' as described, and as we replied earlier, we only know of one man who would truly fit that description. We have no way of knowing that we are referring to the same person because the writer did not specify a name. We suggest you ask the writer, since you have taken it upon yourself to write for him and ask him who he was referring to, since this seems to be an issue of high importance to you.
Previous Message
