Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question Archived Message
Posted by Paul Gunstone on February 21, 2004, 4:46 pm, in reply to "Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question"
Hi all, Have to agree with Alan on this one, we are always led to believe that any ONE thing can consist fo either a SOLID a LIQUID or a GAS! To start pulling things apart to find exact definitions of their existance, is to say in the least a little rediculous. Maybe the boffins at the local glider club should consider getting out a little more!! Just my opinion, Gunner!
|
Message Thread:
- 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - John Wallis February 20, 2004, 10:47 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Alan Kane February 20, 2004, 11:18 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Phil Dunmore February 20, 2004, 11:20 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Lee A Dawson February 21, 2004, 12:17 am
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - nigel mc February 21, 2004, 12:51 am
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Peter Warman February 21, 2004, 10:38 am
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Paul Gunstone February 21, 2004, 4:46 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Chris Angus February 21, 2004, 6:20 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Rob Drinkwater February 21, 2004, 6:48 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Peter Wright February 22, 2004, 1:01 pm
- Re: 4 gas or not 4 gas that is the question - Ed Kaps February 22, 2004, 7:28 pm
|
|