Back to Forum |
Post a Response |
Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Tom Williams on February 23, 2007, 7:35 pm I took a couple of hours out of work this morning to see my MP about the proposed 4-2-2 testing. Whilst waiting I flicked through the local paper. Several MoT stations in the constituency had large adverts,including a multi-lane site. Tom W
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by martin young on February 23, 2007, 8:17 pm, in reply to "Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Kevin Apps on February 23, 2007, 8:49 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Graham Bullock on February 23, 2007, 10:56 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual." Graham
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Tom Williams on February 24, 2007, 9:51 am, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual." Your point is well made and I agree with you. However, I think that if I owned ( with the bank) one of the many new automated test lanes that have recently been built in this area I might be a little concerned that it was going to lay idle for a year and then operate at 50% of it's planned capacity. Likewise, many of us must carry out remedial work for the MoT test. Regards Tom W
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Kevin Apps on February 24, 2007, 5:43 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Tom Williams on February 24, 2007, 9:54 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual." ATL is the way forward, there is no doubt about that. My thought is that many of them have been built in rented industrial units using bank finance. If we adopt the new scheme, in the year following it's inception there will be no testing.
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Kevin Apps on February 24, 2007, 11:54 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Dave Hill on February 25, 2007, 2:39 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual." Many testers are like you and me, busy diagnosing stuff & sorting other day-to-day problems. I do about two tests a week (two too many aswell). Its guys like me that bring the average way down. This 4 2 2 thing is just another ill thought out plan. I cant see any point in fighting it, as the government cant see what’s in front of their faces with all the other failings that Britain is going through. This country is going down the toilet fast with still tighter regulations & higher costs are imposed on businesses & the public alike. Its all fine & dandy having the safest working environment in the world (which we don't have) but when building firms will no longer take on youngsters under 18 because they cant go up a ladder or work on scaffolding or be in a harmful environment (there isnt a safe place on a building site). Is it any wonder we have a skills shortage? Still, at least the government doesn’t squander the money that they squeeze out of us all. Look at the excellent health, education, military, transport services & systems that they allow us to use at our pleasure Sorry to drift off topic, but its getting beyond a joke. Life abroad is sounding more attractive daily. I wonder who is going to fund the spongers on the Dole with 10 kids & a £75,000 tax free income, when so many of the earning population have abandoned ship? Cheers for letting me get that off my chest Dave Hill
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Kevin Apps on February 25, 2007, 4:25 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Tom Williams on February 25, 2007, 5:01 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual." You're dead right, a great many testers do very few tests. Their day is probably taken up with servicing ,clutches etc. Main dealers with test facilities see few cars under 4yrs old anyway. Regards, Tom.
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Kevin Apps on February 25, 2007, 6:12 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Dave Stock on February 25, 2007, 7:14 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Dave Hill on February 25, 2007, 11:50 pm, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual." Trust you to bring up the Exploder . I don’t know, we are made to feel guilty for everything we do these days. From using too much water (dishwashers) to running a thirsty motor. The folks running the country dont seem to be in a hurry to ditch the Jags. What message does this give, its ok to leave a large carbon footprint if you are loaded! I am not loaded & I dont go flying all over the planet leaving a huge CF (Carbon Footprint), so forgive me if I dont feel too guilty at running a 19 MPG motor. I do understand that something needs to be done, but surely a plan needs to be made that allows people to continue to travel in a convenient & cost effective manner. I suppose the plan is to force folks to ditch the car altogether & turn to buses & trains. Not a pleasant thought hey! Cheers Dave Hill (Dummy stil firmly in mouth)
|
Re: Apathy rules as usual.
Posted by Dave Harney on February 26, 2007, 12:14 am, in reply to "Re: Apathy rules as usual."
|
Copyright © uk autotalk