So a US president who might make peace with Russia represents a threat to Europe and means the UK should re-arm and prepare to defend itself, maybe even against the US? So that means he approves of the current approach of sabre rattling and pumping arms, money and mercenaries into Ukraine as the best possible course of action and not in itself posing a danger to the UK or to the wider world. The opposition to nuclear weapons is because the US can veto them and they're too expensive, not that they're a terrible idea in the first place. BRICS gets no mention, so the implication is that it's right for the US, UK and Europe to dominate the world, even if they did a few bad things in the past. The graun's MI6 handlers must have been on his case...

'We are faced throughout our lives with a choice of consistencies. Either our values or our positions can remain unchanged, but not both. Consistently defending our values – such as opposition to imperialism, fascism and wars of aggression – demands that we should be ready to alter our assessments as the nature of these threats changes.'

F* off George you condescending arse, go and defend your precious 'values' on the front lines in Ukraine if you care so much and stop trying to get the rest of us signed up to your statist suicide pact.

jeers,
I