I saw it earlier today and thought I would post it, but then got sidetracked.

It's interesting quite how at odds with their general stance on this he is. Perhaps they are using him as a fig leaf so they can say they allowed all sides to comment, even though it's enormously, massively biased just on a "column inches" basis, never mind the linguistic fuckery they pull and all the other propagandistic manipulation.

I saw this at the bottom (quite ironic that in their "Comment is Free" section they don't open this to comments) "Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here."

I wonder which responses they will publish??? I think we can guess.