Even as we post and read everyday/most days some form of media criticism it's still surprising how corrupt the media is now, even for a supposedly unpopular (to the corporate centrist shit-lib class) president. Even comparing it to when the second Iraq war crime was going on there was WAY more dissent and questioning in even the most mainstream of mainstream media. Now? Repeating all the lies and false framing and almost no suggestions that some of this may not be correct.

Like this steaming pile of cack from the fraudian; not labelled as such but in the mould of their "helpful" "explainer" type articles, i.e. let us give you the official talking points and no facts.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/why-trump-us-attacked-caracas-captured-venezuela-president-nicolas-maduro

They do have one critical piece that I can see but I'm sure that's just for window dressing and so they can point it out and say, "See? Both sides!" Even the supposed dissenting article is packed with propaganda corn: "Venezuela has many problems, including drug gangs and authoritarian rule," for example. At least he calls it an abduction.


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/04/donald-trump-usa-venezuela-coup-maduro-iran