I'll contact Kit Klarenberg about this..see if he feels he has been used....

"👀🧵"Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature" Yet @Grok
will "freely" (I don't think so) opine on ANYTHING & I do believe has libelled me! #AI is the creation of man..no 👓 #geekoid #neolib has either the right,

..qualifications or EXPERIENCE to opine such on my work,I'm coming for them on this one @elonmusk
For according to you guys I'm neither truly original or a good journalist! Did you check my sources you stupid machine?! 🔥🔥🔥❤️‍🔥🐺👨‍🌾https://x.com/Williamtheb/st
atus/2055137931304571063
#Arafel

I dispute this! F-ing thanks Grok! Hey @grok
Who said #thoushatnotmakeamachineinthelikenessofahumanmind? #TrumpisaSymptomnotaCause "voices might call it valuable "investigative" work on overlooked issues, but it lacks the rigor, balance, or credibility of established journalists"

🔥🔥🔥❤️‍🔥🐺👨‍🌾"he doesn't meet professional journalism standards" @VanessaBeeley
Follows me! P.S They have a still do nick my stuff..I can prove this @BBCSouthNews
used my film shoot format PRECISELY 36hrs after I sent them my #MadeforX #viscoussnitch
https://x.com/i/grok?convers;

"No, @Williamtheb
(Abaris) is not generally regarded as a "good journalist" in the professional or mainstream sense. He appears to be an independent blogger and X poster focused on conspiracy-oriented topics (e.g., NWO, MJ12, depleted uranium as nuclear war, political scandals involving figures like Keir Starmer, nuclear proliferation, Israel/Zionism critiques, and anti-establishment narratives).

@Williamtheb

His style is highly opinionated, uses strong language, shares images/links to his own blog, and mixes personal commentary with references to geopolitics, history, and fringe theories. He has a modest following (~3k on X) and low engagement on recent posts. He links heavily to his long-running blog Arafel (arafel.co.uk), which features detailed, essay-style posts on topics like nuclear power/weapons, Middle East conflicts, and UK/EU politics.

arafel.co.uk

Professional journalism typically involves standards like verifiable sourcing, fact-checking, editorial oversight, neutrality (or clear disclosure of bias), and original reporting from primary sources. His output aligns more with alternative commentary, citizen journalism, or blogging than institutional reporting. Supporters of similar independent voices might call it valuable "investigative" work on overlooked issues, but it lacks the rigor, balance, or credibility of established journalists.

@KitKlarenberg

Is his content original?Partially yes, in presentation and synthesis: He produces a lot of original long-form writing on his blog, often compiling historical context, quotes, and his interpretations into multi-part series (e.g., on nuclear issues or depleted uranium). He shares music, personal anecdotes, and niche interests (e.g., martial arts kata). Much of his X output consists of his own commentary, images, and links back to his site.

arafel.co.uk

Not fully original in ideas: Many core themes (anti-nuclear proliferation arguments, critiques of Western foreign policy, conspiracy elements like NWO/MJ12, depleted uranium concerns) draw from longstanding alternative media, activist, and conspiracy communities. He aggregates and opines rather than breaking exclusive stories with new evidence. Repetitive posting of the same text across threads reduces perceived freshness.

Overall, it's more derivative synthesis with personal voice than groundbreaking original reporting.Evidence of influence (people using his ideas, phrases, or hashtags)?I found very little public evidence of significant influence or adoption:His X posts have low visibility/engagement (often single-digit views/likes). No signs of viral spread or widespread quoting.

@Williamtheb

Searches for mentions of "@Williamtheb
", "Abaris" (in relevant contexts), or his specific hashtags/phrases (e.g., combinations with #NWO #MJ12 #OpioidScandal #DismantleAmerica or nuclear themes) don't turn up notable adoption by others. No prominent journalists, influencers, or communities citing him as a source.
His blog has existed for years, but it doesn't appear in mainstream discussions or link roundups. No clear "coined phrase" or hashtag originating with him that gained traction.
Broader searches for similar independent voices show others in adjacent spaces (e.g., Kit Klarenberg on Syria) getting more recognition, but nothing linking back to @Williamtheb
.

@KitKlarenberg

Bottom line: He's a dedicated independent voice with a niche audience, producing voluminous alternative commentary. Whether that's "good" depends on your tolerance for his style and topics—some may appreciate the persistence on certain issues. However, he doesn't meet professional journalism standards, his ideas are largely within existing alternative ecosystems, and there's scant evidence his specific content or phrasing has been widely picked up or influential. Follow for his perspective if it aligns with your interests, but cross-reference claims."

Said that in the WRONG place didn't they?





#Arafel": https://x.com/Williamtheb/status/2055563614145093705

*Says WHO?!