Re: John Pilger - Tears For Christchurch: Australia First Imported Hate In 1788. Now We’re In The Export Archived Message
Posted by turtleman on March 18, 2019, 2:23 pm, in reply to "Re: John Pilger - Tears For Christchurch: Australia First Imported Hate In 1788. Now We’re In The Export"
Derek, I'll repeat my question, with appropriate emphases: The WoT is well into its 18th year. Given that reality, and all it implies, do you really [. . .] consider this article [. . .] to be intelligent or useful analysis? Or to put it more directly, do you not see how this sort of analysis is useful to the PTB? The fact that the author thought this following tweet "says it best" is a dead giveaway: "I feel so sad. We begged you to stop amplifying and normalising hatred and racism. But you told us we were 'politically correct' and 'freedom of speech' was more important. The more you gave the far-right a platform, the more powerful they got. We begged you." The media amplifies diversity and identity politics too (maybe even more). Like all major wars, the bankers behind the WoT fund both (or multiple) sides. The PTB directing the WoT are manipulating public perception and behaviour with remarkable skill. The "alternate" landscape has become the perfect 'countersubject' in one marvelous diabolical fugue. The Masters would love to see more volunteers giving up their moral and mental sovereignty and freedom for the sake of 'racism' and 'inequality.' The war has to be the focus! The War Party's manipulation schemes need to be exposed and dismantled! We are not whites, collectively guilty of racism. We are INDIVIDUALS capable of following truth and protecting ourselves from these manipulations! As members of a 'media analysis' site, we can all do better. In short, I give this article a thumbs down. turtleman
|
|