Then there's the usual array of sleight of language all through the article
Exactly! The Guardian are excelling in that regard. Take this from last Monday:
Israeli forces and Hamas exchanged rocket fire on Monday night amid fears of a new conflict in Gaza.
That's the opening sentence - obviously designed to establish a non-existent parity between hugely assymetric forces. They then go on to push this lie further:
Hamas and Israel have fought three conflicts in the past decade, and battled in dozens of minor flare-ups since the last one in 2014. With little to show for any previous violence, neither side has expressed interest in full-fledged war.
An obvious travesty! Leaving aside the fact that the 'three conflicts' have simply been shooting fish in a barrel exercises from an IOF perspective, the idea that Hamas is in a position to wage a 'full-fledged war' is utterly preposterous. As we know, Israel operates with near 100% impunity - but a 'fully-fledged war[ring]' on Gaza would probably see that blighted territory and all its inhabitants wiped out in minutes. Such a scenario would probably attract a degree of criticism with which even the Israelis would be uncomfortable. And the dismissive notion of 'minor flare-ups' is a travesty also. Again, as we know, even in those very regular 'minor flare-ups' it's Palestinians who suffer by far the greatest losses - without exception.