A side-shift from "reasons" to "criteria" doesn't really help support your statement. I think you will have to agree that abortions aren't carried out for "reasons" of preserving Aryan ethnic purity and on the matter of "criteria" cases with hereditary or congenital defect aren't about racial purity either but usually the ability to function in life. That's a hard judgement to make I know ( coming from a genetic line irradiated by the UK government and thus many times more at risk of such conditions) but its up to the woman who is the best judge of the circumstances of her own life and her ability or indeed willingness to take that on: its rightly her decision on whether to proceed to have such a child or indeed any child.
Otherwise the Nazis were actually very much anti-abortion for "Aryan" reasons. Nazi Crosses of honour were awarded to mothers according to the number of children they had: bronze for four to five children, silver for six to seven, gold for eight or more and for "exceptional birth performances" no less than Hitler himself would served as godfather to a tenth child. In 1943, providing an abortion to an "Aryan" woman became a capital offence because "the vitality of the German people was threatened" . Strict rules were already in place by 1936 under which it was a crime to advertise, offer or give information on abortion services. Paragraph 219a of the Nazi penal code was in fact still blocking access to abortion up until February this year in Germany. So...somewhat ironically, it's you that would apparently have been on the side of actual (not fantasised) Nazi eugenic-inspired law.
- You doubtless know this already, but in your rush to smear others with supporting Nazi eugenic programmes, just em...forgot to mention it...