Re: All communication in future will be by nods and winks unless you are in the exempted classes, we kn Archived Message
Posted by dovetailjoint on April 20, 2019, 3:44 pm, in reply to "All communication in future will be by nods and winks unless you are in the exempted classes, we kn "
Was Trump really 'obstructing justice' or was he, instead, attempting to stop a great injustice being done to him, because he knew he was innocent of the charges of colluding with the Russians to win the presidential election? If one is innocent and one tries to say this and avoid being 'railroaded' for something one didn't do and then one is finally acquitted of the charges, found not guilty, how on earth can one be guilty of 'obstructing justice' in relation to something one hasn't done? Wouldn't one have to know one was guilty and only then would one be found to have obstructed justice in covering up a crime one had committed. This spin, that because one hasn't found proof and evidence of a crime, that doesn't mean a crime hasn't been committed; is really twisted and absurd legal logic. If there's no evidence that a crime has been committed and no charges have been made after an investigation and no trial because the evidence doesn't exist; then one is innocent, 100% innocent. A couple of non-existant whisps of smoke, show that there is no ####ing fire! Trying to 'get Trump' on obstruction for soemthing that he didn't do, isn't going to fool his supporters for a minute and it shouldn't fool anyone else either, unless one is deranged like Rachel Maddow.
|
|