So many words, John, to prove to yourself that an honest whistle-blower is a 'quack'. Oh how the out Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym on May 25, 2019, 6:59 am, in reply to "Re: No question Andrew Wakefield has a good case, no he hasn't...."
-raged defenders of current medical orthodoxy do love that meaning-free snarl-word! Almost as good a thoughtstopper as 'Cospithirry!' I'll simply repeat - for any interested onlookers: Andrew Wakefield and friends have a good, solid case that something is definitely wrong with current MMR protocols in particular, and with the wider current conventional wisdom on vaccines. And any lay person can discover the truth of that for themselves. You don't have to be a medical professional to see it, conclusively. Indeed, the professionals are often amongst the most brain-washed on this matter currently, and their indoctrination-soused opinion on it is to be taken with considerable, much-salted reservation. Anyone stewarding the welfare of children, particularly newborns, or other vulnerable young animals, needs to look into this unmistakable problem seriously. A good precautionary maxim to begin with is: If in doubt, don't! A stance that I and others I know have taken for a long time, with no - that's zero - bad effects; which is a damn' sight more than you can say about the MMR vaccines. Other than that, I'll leave it there. Don't take vaccines simply on trust! Something is - unmistakably, obviously - rotten in their current (for profit) usage! And having said that, with a further exhortation to onlookers to do your own due diligence in the large body of sound evidence that something is wrong with current-usage vaccines, I'll bow out of this thread. (Hint: Del Bigtree's 'Highwire' videos are a good starting point.) Byeee!
|
|